The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / San Francisco, Oakland Sue 5 Oil Giants for Climate Change Impacts
San Francisco, Oakland Sue 5 Oil Giants for Climate Change Impacts

San Francisco, Oakland Sue 5 Oil Giants for Climate Change Impacts

September 20, 2017 Filed Under: California Climate Lawsuits, Featured, Liability Litigation

print
By Bobby Magill

The cities of San Francisco and Oakland, Calif., filed suit on Wednesday against five oil companies—ExxonMobil, BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips and Shell—in California state court to hold them accountable for their role in global warming-driven sea level rise, which is causing billions of dollars of current and future damage.

The lawsuits are part of mounting climate-related legal action against Exxon and other fossil fuel producers, including investor and employee suits and state investigations seeking to hold fossil fuel companies responsible for actions that are exacerbating global warming.

The cities’ litigation aims to force the companies to fund a sea level rise abatement program that will be used to build sea walls and other structures to protect about $49 billion in public and private property sitting within six feet of the current sea level. The cities cited research that says sea level may rise up to 10 feet by 2100, causing “catastrophic” damage, according to a report California officials released in April.

Exxon did not respond to a request for comment. A ConocoPhillips spokesman said the company would have no comment on pending litigation and referred to its stance on climate change on its website. None of the other companies responded to requests for comment or made public statements.

The property most at risk from rising seas in the San Francisco Bay Area includes the Oakland Airport, which is likely to be submerged by the Pacific Ocean by the end of the century, city officials said.

The lawsuits, filed separately, make a public nuisance claim against the companies and say the firms have known for decades that their products were accelerating global warming. Instead of acting to reduce harm, the companies attempted to undermine climate science and mislead the public by claiming fossil fuel production is environmentally responsible, the lawsuits allege.

Recent research ties 90 of the world’s largest fossil fuel companies to about half of all modern global warming, much of which has occurred since 1980. Exxon and other companies had already known for since the early 1970s that the fossil fuel they produce causes global warming, but they did nothing to mitigate the harm.

“These fossil fuel companies profited handsomely for decades while knowing they were putting the fate of our cities at risk,” San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera said in a statement. “Instead of owning up to it, they copied a page from the Big Tobacco playbook. They launched a multi-million dollar disinformation campaign to deny and discredit what was clear even to their own scientists: global warming is real, and their product is a huge part of the problem. Now, the bill has come due. It’s time for these companies to take responsibility for the harms they have caused and are continuing to cause.”

Carroll Muffett, chief executive of the Center for International Environmental Law, said that the lawsuits open a new legal pathway for cities to address the impacts of climate change.

By focusing narrowly on what cities are having to spend now and what it will take to adapt to climate change, San Francisco and Oakland are presenting courts with quantifiable and predictable climate impacts, Muffett said.

“Costs can be quantified. They’re not an abstraction,” he said. “It will be difficult for the parties to argue that these claims are political or won’t have standing. The link between sea level rise and the need for San Francisco and Oakland to respond to that sea level rise are very straightforward.”

The cities’ case uses a slightly different strategy than a lawsuit filed in July by San Mateo and Marin Counties and the city of Imperial Beach against 37 fossil fuel companies for their role in sea level rise. The counties’ lawsuit makes claims of both public nuisance and negligence against the companies.

The cities, however, are making only a nuisance claim, and they targeted only the largest oil companies. The lawsuit states explicitly that the cities are not seeking to impose any liability for the companies’ greenhouse gas emissions and that they are not trying to stop the companies from producing fossil fuels.

“This case is, fundamentally, about shifting the cost of abating sea level rise harm — one of global warming’s gravest harms — back onto the companies,” the lawsuit states.

Michael Burger, executive director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University, said the lawsuit’s public nuisance argument seeks only to shift the costs of climate adaptation from taxpayers to the companies responsible for global warming.

“They arguably come closer to putting a number on what they’re seeking from fossil fuel companies” than the counties’ lawsuit does, he said.

The case is similar to legal action against tobacco companies in the 1980s, he said.

“The basic idea being that these companies knew the risks and have known the risks and yet have carried on their activities despite that,” Burger said. “Plaintiffs are seeking to have them pay for the harms that have resulted from their actions.”

Ken Kimmell, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the lawsuits are significant because, for the first time, two major cities are filing suit against the major fossil fuel producers to hold them accountable for playing a role in causing global warming.

“I think what’s happening here big picture is that as the federal government has gone AWOL on addressing climate change, it’s not surprising that people who are harmed by climate change are looking to the courts to offer a remedy,” he said. “It’s a very important start of a conversation about who is really responsible for climate change and who should be forced to bear the costs.”

Vic Sher, a partner in the law firm involved in the counties’ lawsuit, said the science clearly shows that fossil fuel companies’ pollution is causing sea level rise threatening coastal communities.

“Like our lawsuits, these new cases recognize the urgency and importance of coastal communities taking action to protect their people and property from the costs and consequences of climate change,” Sher said.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: California Climate Lawsuits, Featured, Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Bedeviled by sea level rise, 3 Calif. communities take on fossil fuel industry says:
    September 22, 2017 at 12:25 pm

    […] San Francisco, Oakland Sue 5 Oil Giants for Climate Change Impacts […]

  2. How will Puerto Rico, drowning in debt, pay to rebuild? says:
    October 23, 2017 at 10:13 am

    […] San Francisco, Oakland Sue 5 Oil Giants for Climate Change Impacts […]

  3. Oil and gas companies should pay for climate impacts, British Columbia cities say says:
    October 31, 2017 at 5:07 am

    […] in the vanguard of assessing legal options for making fossil fuel companies pay for the damages. San Francisco and Oakland sued five major oil firms in September over climate change impacts, following three other suits […]

  4. Oil and Gas Industry Should Pay for Climate Impacts, British Columbia Cities Say - Climate Liability News says:
    November 6, 2017 at 3:32 pm

    […] in the vanguard of assessing legal options for making fossil fuel companies pay for the damages. San Francisco and Oakland sued five major oil firms in September over climate change impacts, following three other suits […]

  5. Alaska kids' climate lawsuit joins trend of suing in state courts says:
    November 10, 2017 at 9:01 am

    […] lawsuits against fossil fuel companies for climate-related damages. San Francisco and Oakland filed separate suits in California courts, as did San Mateo and San Marin counties as well as the city of Imperial […]

  6. Alaskan children launch climate lawsuit against state | The Big Raise says:
    November 13, 2017 at 9:24 am

    […] lawsuits against fossil fuel companies for climate-related damages. San Francisco and Oakland filed separate suits in California courts, as did San Mateo and San Marin counties as well as the city of […]

  7. Credit warning could spur cities to consider climate liability suits says:
    December 4, 2017 at 12:48 pm

    […] California cities of San Francisco, Oakland and Imperial Beach, and San Mateo and Marin counties have sued ExxonMobil, BP and other major fossil fuel companies for their responsibility for climate impacts […]

  8. California climate lawsuits: different strategies, same goal says:
    December 18, 2017 at 9:43 am

    […] suits by San Francisco and Oakland, led by the city’s attorneys but also guided by another firm dedicated to taking on large […]

  9. Latest California climate liability lawsuit filed by Santa Cruz says:
    December 20, 2017 at 3:36 pm

    […] companies petitioned to have the earlier suits, including two others filed by the cities of San Francisco and Oakland, moved to federal court, a venue that in the past has been successful in fighting climate liability […]

  10. American Citizens Are Doing What Trump Won't: Holding Polluters Accountable in Court | Donald J. Trump No. 45 says:
    December 22, 2017 at 6:40 am

    […] Pawa’s most recent cases are in California, where he’s representing the cities of San Francisco and Oakland in suits against ExxonMobil, BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and Shell. The lawsuits are trying […]

  11. Climate liability cases 'as American as apple pie,' experts argue says:
    January 26, 2018 at 8:55 am

    […] and the city of Imperial Beach last July sued 37 companies citing damages from sea level rise. San Francisco and Oakland followed in September suing five of the largest oil companies. The city and county of Santa Cruz […]

  12. As San Francisco, Oakland press climate cases, a legal nod to Kivalina says:
    February 8, 2018 at 11:46 am

    […] is currently involved in the lawsuits filed by  San Francisco and Oakland against five large petroleum companies last September in California state court. And he is fighting […]

  13. In California climate cases, jurisdictional battle takes center stage says:
    February 27, 2018 at 8:59 am

    […] cities of San Francisco and Oakland, as well as the counties of Marin and San Mateo and the city of Imperial Beach argued their claims […]

  14. Exxon-funded study rebuts climate research that shows it deceived public says:
    March 8, 2018 at 1:39 pm

    […] and other fossil fuel companies are facing suits by multiple California communities, including San Francisco and Oakland, Imperial Beach, Richmond and Santa Cruz, along with the counties of Marin, San Mateo and Santa […]

  15. Exxon-Funded Study Rebuts Research That Showed It Deceived Public on Climate – MassCentral BETA says:
    March 9, 2018 at 10:32 am

    […] and other fossil fuel companies are facing suits by multiple California communities, including San Francisco and Oakland, Imperial Beach, Richmond and Santa Cruz, along with the counties of Marin, San Mateo and Santa […]

  16. Schwarzenegger aims to sue Big Oil for climate change. Can he succeed? says:
    March 14, 2018 at 10:51 am

    […] how he has suffered at the hands of oil companies, and that will be difficult to establish. Cities such as San Francisco and New York City are suing oil companies on behalf of their residents and claiming that climate […]

  17. In judge's climate tutorial, Big Oil doubles down on science 'uncertainty' says:
    March 22, 2018 at 8:04 am

    […] tutorial to inform him of the issues at hand in the case. The cities of San Francisco and Oakland are suing five major oil companies for public nuisance, saying the companies have known for decades their products contributed to […]

  18. Four more oil giants acknowledge climate consensus to federal judge says:
    April 6, 2018 at 8:29 am

    […] had been ordered by U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup to educate him as he considers the climate liability cases filed against the five major oil companies by the cities of Oakland and San Francisco. Four […]

  19. Richmond is latest California city to file climate lawsuit vs. Big Oil says:
    May 1, 2018 at 3:22 pm

    […] divesting $5 billion of its pension holdings in fossil fuel stock. Richmond’s Bay Area neighbors Oakland and San Francisco filed their own liability lawsuits last […]

  20. Trump administration brief opposes california climate suits says:
    May 15, 2018 at 4:00 pm

    […] the suits, which were filed separately in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California last September, […]

  21. Federal judge grants discovery in 2 California climate cases says:
    May 24, 2018 at 6:55 pm

    […] cities filed their suits last year, seeking to hold the oil companies responsible for global warming-driven sea level rise, which is […]

  22. Water is Everywhere in Georgetown, Guyana—Our Disrespect for it will Kill Us – The Nature of Cities says:
    May 27, 2018 at 8:36 am

    […] by drowning. But it doesn’t have to end like that. Other cities are fighting back. New York and San Francisco are suing the oil companies for harm from climate change. Arnold Schwarzenegger even wants to go […]

  23. San Francisco sends climate costs to taxpayers as liability suit idles says:
    July 2, 2018 at 2:01 pm

    […] Francisco and Oakland filed their suits last September against five major oil companies—Exxon, Chevron, BP, Shell and ConocoPhillips—seeking […]

  24. San Francisco, Oakland appeal dismissal of climate lawsuits says:
    March 13, 2019 at 10:23 pm

    […] the suit, initially filed in California state court in 2017, the cities allege that “production and promotion of massive […]

  25. Newest Climate Liability Suits: Climate Justice Is Racial Justice - The Climate Docket says:
    June 30, 2020 at 2:04 pm

    […] communities filing lawsuits seeking compensation for climate-related damages. The major cities of San Francisco and Oakland joined in.  It has since grown to include lawsuits on the East Coast (Baltimore, New York City […]

  26. Newest Climate Liability Suits: Climate Justice Is Racial Justice – Climate Change Resources says:
    July 1, 2020 at 12:18 pm

    […] communities filing lawsuits seeking compensation for climate-related damages. The major cities of San Francisco and Oakland joined in.  It has since grown to include lawsuits on the East Coast (Baltimore, New York City […]

  27. On Climate Change's Front Lines, Cape Cod Town Wrestles With Costs - The Climate Docket says:
    September 29, 2020 at 6:20 am

    […] they know drives those impacts and for deceiving the public about it. Some are large cities like Oakland, San Francisco and Washington D.C., and others are smaller towns like Imperial Beach, Calif. and Hoboken, N.J. All […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases

Most Popular

  • Vulnerable Nations Call for Ecocide to Be Recognized As an International Crime
  • U.S. Government Knew Climate Risks in 1970s, Energy Advisory Group Documents Show
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads
  • Why a Tidal Wave of Climate Lawsuits Looms Over the Fossil Fuel Industry
  • New Research Tying 20 Companies to One-Third of Global Emissions Aids Liability Argument

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.