The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Trump Administration Bid to Stop Kids Climate Case Gets December Court Date
Trump Administration Bid to Stop Kids Climate Case Gets December Court Date

Trump Administration Bid to Stop Kids Climate Case Gets December Court Date

November 17, 2017 Filed Under: Liability Litigation

print
By Karen Savage

Attorneys for the Trump administration will have to convince a judge that pre-trial discovery in a climate change lawsuit filed against the U.S. government would cause it irreparable harm.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals announced on Thursday that it will hear oral arguments on Dec. 11 regarding a writ of mandamus filed by the government in Juliana v United States. In that case, 21 young people are suing the Trump administration for failing to protect their future against climate change.

Attorneys for the government filed the writ of mandamus after U.S. District Court Judge Ann Aiken denied their request to have the case dismissed.

A writ of mandamus is a rarely used and even more rarely approved legal maneuver in which a superior court is asked to order a lower court or government agency to comply with the law. It is usually granted under extraordinary circumstances and is considered a legal last resort.

Appeals are normally filed after the trial is held and evidence is presented, but a mandamus appeal could allow the federal government to avoid the discovery process and have the suit dismissed. The case has been paused since July pending a decision on this and other motions.

“This Administration can respond to the limited discovery we seek, and put on its junk climate science at trial in a court of law,” said Julia Olson, co-counsel for the plaintiffs. “What it can’t do is shut the courthouse doors to real constitutional injuries brought by these young people.”

In the suit, the young plaintiffs allege the federal government has failed to protect them, their families and future generations from the effects of climate change and say that the government must enact science-based plan to protect the planet.

Attorneys from the Department of Justice, which represents the federal government, did not respond to a request for comment.

The suit was originally filed in 2015 against the Obama administration. In a response filed days before Obama left office, DOJ attorneys admitted to many of the young plaintiff’s claims, including that monthly global average concentrations of CO2 have reached the dangerous threshold of 400 parts per million. In allegations regarding sea level rise, they admitted levels are slightly greater than what the plaintiffs claimed. After Donald Trump became president, the suit was altered to name him, as well as other current federal government officials, as defendants.

“What is urgently needed right now is a clear, scientific and constitutional discussion of the irreparable harm that climate change is doing to this nation’s youth and the ways we can hold our leaders accountable to begin serious climate recovery efforts,” said 20-year-old plaintiff Jacob Lebel, who said he was looking forward to a full trial.

“It is an extremely positive step that the Ninth Circuit has elected to hear oral argument,” said Phil Gregory, co-counsel for the plaintiffs, adding that he is hopeful that Judge Aiken’s order will be upheld, allowing the case to go forward.

Arguments will be heard at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

“While there is no set timeline for the Ninth Circuit panel to issue a decision, we hope the urgency of the climate crisis is dictating this fast-track briefing and argument schedule,” said Gregory.

“We can’t delay anymore because climate change is an ongoing problem,” said 10-year-old plaintiff Levi Draheim.

“We need to deal with it right now and start reducing the things that are causing it,” said Draheim.“When we win the oral arguments, we can move on and start talking about how to fix the problem not just talk about it.”

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Ireland recognizes constitutional right to a safe climate, environment says:
    December 11, 2017 at 6:18 am

    […] Trump Administration Bid to Stop Kids Climate Case Gets December Court Date […]

  2. Judges question Trump administration attempt to derail youth climate case says:
    December 11, 2017 at 7:19 pm

    […] Trump Administration Bid to Stop Kids Climate Case Gets December Court Date […]

  3. Judges question Trump administration attempt to derail youth climate case – American Unity says:
    December 11, 2017 at 8:32 pm

    […] considering the government’s writ of mandamus request, a rarely used judicial tool that overturns a lower court before a trial has occurred, a […]

  4. Climate liability suits gained traction in 2017, bigger goals lie ahead says:
    January 3, 2018 at 10:10 am

    […] court expressed skepticism of the Trump Administration’s effort to shut down the case using a rare legal tactic called a writ of mandamus. The writ asks the higher court to overrule the lower court before the […]

  5. Youth climate case vs. U.S. government gets October trial date says:
    April 12, 2018 at 3:09 pm

    […] federal government has tried repeatedly to have the case dismissed, including the most recent, a writ of mandamus request that […]

  6. Federal judge refuses to halt discovery in youth climate case says:
    May 29, 2018 at 11:35 am

    […] federal government has tried repeatedly to have the case dismissed, including filing a writ of mandamus request that was denied by the […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases
  • Climate Suits Grew in 2020, Could Clear Huge Hurdle in 2021

Most Popular

  • Hawaii Joins Trend: Recognizes Constitutional Right to Safe Climate and Environment
  • R.I. Wins Battle to Keep Climate Suit Vs. Big Oil in State Court
  • As San Francisco, Oakland Press Climate Cases, They Pay Homage to Tiny Kivalina
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.