The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / International / Ireland Recognizes Constitutional Right to a Safe Climate and Environment
Ireland Recognizes Constitutional Right to a Safe Climate and Environment

Ireland Recognizes Constitutional Right to a Safe Climate and Environment

December 11, 2017 Filed Under: International, Liability Litigation

print
By Karen Savage

A small group of Irish citizens lost its battle to stop a third runway at the Dublin Airport, but scored a monumental win that could force the Irish government to take effective action to meet its climate change goals.

“A right to an environment that is consistent with the human dignity and wellbeing of citizens at large is an essential condition for the fulfilment of all human rights,” wrote High Court Justice Max Barrett in the decision on Nov. 21, which despite ruling the runway could proceed, created a newly acknowledged constitutional right to a healthy environment.

Friends of the Irish Environment (FIE), a nonprofit that works on issues related to sustainable planning and environmental justice, had argued the proposed third runway would result in additional greenhouse gas emissions and hasten the pace of climate change.

Barrett dismissed FIE’s challenge for lack of standing, but opened the door to future suits using the right to a safe climate.

“It is very timely for our climate case—it is so basic and compelling that we hope the courts will see our case in a newly revealed light,” said FIE director Tony Lowe, who added that there is irony in achieving a new right but not be able to apply it to this particular case.

In October, FIE filed a separate lawsuit against the Irish government, alleging that the country’s National Mitigation Plan doesn’t live up to promises it made in the Paris Climate Agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. FIE also alleges that the plan violates the country’s Climate Act, the Irish Constitution and human rights obligations.

Lowe said FIE is considering whether to  appeal the runway ruling, but underscored the importance of the newly acknowledged constitutional right.

“Initially I think everyone in the Court was gobsmacked, to use an Irish expression,” said Lowe. “I understand that within the hour the word had spread through various organs of the government, where consternation was a mild description of the reaction.”

The ruling is similar to the basis of a case in the Netherlands in 2015, when the Hague District Court ruled for the Urgenda Foundation and 900 citizens and ordered the country to reduce its emissions by 25 percent below 1990 levels by 2020. The Dutch government filed an appeal, which will be heard next year, but the initial victory has led citizens of other countries to consider a similar approach.

In Ireland, it worked.

“The ruling has set a precedent which is likely to underpin future actions of this kind. It is the first such recognition of the rights of citizens to enjoy an environment which does not damage their well being,” said John Sweeney, a climatology professor at Maynooth University who has contributed to the work of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Similar to the Urgenda case is Juliana v. United States, in which 21 young people say their constitutional and public trust rights to a safe and livable climate are being violated by the U.S. federal government. Trial in that case has been set for February, but the Trump administration says pre-trial discovery in the case will cause it irreparable harm and has filed for an extraordinary legal measure called a writ of mandamus, ending the case before it reaches trial. Oral arguments on the government’s request will be heard on Monday before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

In his decision, Barrett expressed surprise that FIE did not rely more heavily on the European Convention on Human Rights, which he called a “serious and important document.”

The convention does not specifically address the right to a healthy environment, but does say human rights can be undermined by harm to the environment and environmental risks.

Barrett said that recognizing the constitutional right to a livable environment is only a first step.

“Concrete duties and responsibilities will fall in time to be defined and demarcated,” said Barrett. “But to start down that path of definition and demarcation, one first has to recognise that there is a personal constitutional right to an environment that is consistent with the human dignity and well-being of citizens at large and upon which those duties and responsibilities will be constructed. This the court does.”

Barrett also made it clear that he intends his ruling to have a long-lasting impact.

“It is not so utopian a right that it can never be enforced. Once concretised into specific duties and obligations, its enforcement is entirely practicable,” Barrett wrote in the ruling.

“The aspect of most relevance relates to intergenerational equity, something which has underpinned legislation on climate change in several other jurisdictions,” said Sweeney.  “It gives standing to individuals to pursue actions where political failures to protect citizens and their children from climate change impacts exist.”

“I cannot see how we—or anyone—would bring any future environmental cases without citing this judgment,” said Lowe.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: International, Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Links 12/14/17 | naked capitalism – Courtier en Bourse says:
    December 14, 2017 at 7:41 am

    […] L'Irlande reconnaît le droit constitutionnel à un climat et à un climat sûrs Actualités en matière de responsabilité climatique […]

  2. Winter Solstice Today – Flaky Fizzle – Numb Next Week, But Not Pioneer Cold | Paul Douglas says:
    December 20, 2017 at 11:52 pm

    […] gas emissions in response to a class action lawsuit from its citizens. A judge in Ireland recently ruled that citizens have a constitutional right to a safe climate and environment. And last month, a […]

  3. Snow North – Snow South – Beige Christmas for the MSP Metro? | Paul Douglas says:
    December 22, 2017 at 12:04 am

    […] gas emissions in response to a class action lawsuit from its citizens. A judge in Ireland recently ruled that citizens have a constitutional right to a safe climate and environment. And last month, a […]

  4. American Citizens Are Doing What Trump Won't: Holding Polluters Accountable in Court | Donald J. Trump No. 45 says:
    December 22, 2017 at 6:39 am

    […] in response to a class action lawsuit from its citizens. A judge in Ireland recently ruled that citizens have a constitutional right to a safe climate and environment. And last month, a […]

  5. Climate liability suits gained traction in 2017, bigger goals lie ahead says:
    January 3, 2018 at 6:00 am

    […] Ireland Recognizes Constitutional Right to a Safe Climate and Environment […]

  6. Lawsuits as Environmental Battleground: A Corporate Trade Group Gets Busy - Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly says:
    January 3, 2018 at 10:11 am

    […] successes: in the Netherlands a class action lawsuit was won to lower emissions; in Ireland they recently ruled that they have a constitutional right to a nontoxic environment; and in Germany, a climate […]

  7. Hawaii joins trend: court recognizes constitutional right to a safe climate says:
    January 5, 2018 at 6:01 am

    […] Ireland Recognizes Constitutional Right to a Safe Climate and Environment […]

  8. Courts vs. Climate Change – Things Are Good says:
    January 11, 2018 at 12:40 pm

    […] gas emissions in response to a class action lawsuit from its citizens. A judge in Ireland recently ruled that citizens have a constitutional right to a safe climate and environment. And last month, a […]

  9. Hawaii recognizes constitutional right to safe climate and environment - FueladdictsFueladdicts says:
    February 9, 2018 at 10:36 am

    […] with more than 170 countries guaranteeing some form of a safe environment. A recent decision by Ireland’s highest court recognized for the first time a personal constitutional “right to an environment that is […]

  10. International court ruling: a safe climate is a human right says:
    February 13, 2018 at 1:22 pm

    […] isn’t new, but it hasn’t been widely applied by courts. The opinion comes at a time when a number of climate lawsuits have been filed around the world to try to establish the same or similar legal principles and […]

  11. Philippines human rights commission begins climate hearings vs. oil giants says:
    March 27, 2018 at 4:19 pm

    […] instead of seeking accountability from fossil fuel companies. Courts in a handful of countries, such as Ireland,  the Netherlands and Pakistan, have acknowledged the connection between human rights and a […]

  12. Netherlands works to overturn landmark Urgenda climate ruling says:
    May 24, 2018 at 1:41 pm

    […] lower court’s ruling inspired lawsuits subsequently filed in countries such as Norway, Pakistan, Ireland, Belgium, Colombia, Switzerland and New […]

  13. Preserve Athlumney Castle Wall & Trees – Tree Preservation Ireland says:
    January 29, 2019 at 10:44 pm

    […] “A right to an environment that is consistent with the human dignity and wellbeing of citizens at large is an essential condition for the fulfillment of all human rights,” wrote High Court Justice Max Barrett in the decision on Nov.  21, 2017 opened the door to future suits using the right to a safe climate.  “The ruling has set a precedent which is likely to underpin future actions of this kind.  It is the first such recognition of the rights of citizens to enjoy an environment which does not damage their well being. https://www.climatedocket.com/2017/12/11/ireland-constitutional-right-climate-environment-fie… […]

  14. Email Sent To Local Councils, Part 2 – Supporting Documentation – Tree Preservation Ireland says:
    March 2, 2019 at 7:44 pm

    […] https://www.climatedocket.com/2017/12/11/ireland-constitutional-right-climate-environment-fie… […]

  15. Letter Sent To Meath County Council – February 7th. – Tree Preservation Ireland says:
    March 6, 2019 at 2:53 pm

    […] https://www.climatedocket.com/2017/12/11/ireland-constitutional-right-climate-environment-fie… […]

  16. Email Sent To The Chief Executive Of Meath County Council & The Planning Dept, February 7th, 2019 – Tree Preservation Ireland says:
    March 16, 2019 at 12:01 pm

    […] https://www.climatedocket.com/2017/12/11/ireland-constitutional-right-climate-environment-fie… […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases
  • Climate Suits Grew in 2020, Could Clear Huge Hurdle in 2021

Most Popular

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Hawaii Joins Trend: Recognizes Constitutional Right to Safe Climate and Environment
  • R.I. Wins Battle to Keep Climate Suit Vs. Big Oil in State Court
  • Carbon Majors Can Be Held Liable for Human Rights Violations, Philippines Commission Rules
  • 2019: The Year Climate Litigation Hit High Gear

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.