The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / International / Philippines Human Rights Commission Begins Climate Hearings Vs. Fossil Fuel Giants
Philippines Human Rights Commission Begins Climate Hearings Vs. Fossil Fuel Giants

Philippines Human Rights Commission Begins Climate Hearings Vs. Fossil Fuel Giants

March 27, 2018 Filed Under: International

print
By Ucilia Wang

The Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines is holding the first public hearing of its investigation into whether fossil fuel companies have violated the human rights of its citizens, who have endured devastating climate-related disasters in recent years.

The five-person commission heard emotional testimony on Tuesday about the impact of severe drought and extreme storms on farmers, fishermen and their families. They also listened to scientists who laid out global and Philippines-specific data on climate change and presented research that attributed two-thirds of the man-made emissions since the start of the industrial age to 90 oil, gas, coal and cement companies. The two-day hearing continued on Wednesday.

Zelda Soriano of Greenpeace Southeast Asia delivered the opening statement, which compared the health and environmental impact of climate change—and the companies involved—to smoking and its health effects.

“Today, there’s that little government warning on every cigarette pack because once upon a time, some people sued the giant cigarette companies, and the courts listened to them and rejected the excuses that the impacts of smoking cannot be quantified,” Soriano told the commissioners.

The commission launched the investigation in 2015 after receiving a petition from a group that included Greenpeace, community groups and 18 individuals. The case targets 47 so-called Carbon Majors, which includes the world’s largest oil, gas, coal and cement companies, even those that don’t operate in the Philippines.

None of these companies, which include ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP, Anglo American and Total, spoke in front of the commission during the first day of the hearing. More than a dozen of them have challenged the commission’s authority to investigate them and have not cooperated in its proceedings. The cement firm, CEMEX, has since dropped its jurisdictional challenge, the commission announced during the hearing.

An island nation, the Philippines among the countries most at risk from climate change. The country has absorbed an increasing number of destructive natural disasters, including Typhoon Haiyan, which killed more than 6,300 people in 2013, the petitioners said.  

The case is unusual for seeking accountability through the human rights lens: determining whether these companies are largely responsible for climate impacts and are therefore violating Filipinos’ basic rights to life, water, food, sanitation, adequate housing and self-determination.  

The case is also novel for its venue: the commission can’t impose financial penalties or send people to jail. But its findings and potential recommendations could lead to tougher regulations or could exert public pressure on the companies to cut their emissions and move away from extracting, selling and using fossil fuels.

Any findings of human rights abuse could also become a foundation for lawsuits around the world since the Carbon Majors do business in many countries.  

“This hearing is just the start, and there will be more opportunities for communities and experts to testify, and for companies to get involved,” said Kristin Casper, litigation counsel of Greenpeace’s climate justice and liability project.

Human rights claims aren’t common in climate cases worldwide, but they are emerging. They tend to seek stronger climate action plans from governments, instead of seeking accountability from fossil fuel companies. Courts in a handful of countries, such as Ireland,  the Netherlands and Pakistan, have acknowledged the connection between human rights and a government’s responsibility to protect the environment.

In Colombia, an appellate court is considering a case from 25 youths who contend that the government violated their constitutional rights to life and a healthy environment by failing to honor its commitment to the Paris Climate Agreement to stop deforestation in the Amazon.

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights recently issued a landmark opinion that says people have the right to live in a healthy environment. The opinion could force Latin American countries to take more aggressive actions to limit emissions.

In the United States, the case brought by 21 young people in Oregon, Juliana v. United States, argues that the federal government violated the youths’ constitutional rights to life, liberty and property by enacting policies that support fossil fuel development.  

The legal group representing the plaintiffs in Juliana, Our Children’s Trust, is one of at least 10 organizations that have submitted amicus briefs in support of the petitioners in the Philippines.

“The case brings truth out and helps to give people who may otherwise not have a voice to tell their stories and access to justice,” said Erika Lennon, senior attorney in the climate & energy program at the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), which also filed an amicus brief.

In addition to testimony from local residents and Filipino scientists, the commission also heard a presentation by Peter Frumhoff, director of science and policy at the Union of Concerned Scientists, via Skype from New York City. He discussed the science behind tying specific amounts of emissions and global warming to particular companies, which is the basis for being able to hold them accountable.

The commission is scheduled to hear from six more witnesses before wrapping up the two-day hearing. One of them, Lisa Hamilton from the Center for International Environmental Law, is expected to discuss evidence of how fossil fuel companies have misled the public about climate risks.

The hearing phase is expected to last a year, after which the commission will issue a report. The next hearing is scheduled for May, and subsequent hearings will be held in other countries in an attempt to  nudge the Carbon Majors to participate. One is planned for New York City in September.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: International

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. [News] Philippines human rights commission begins climate hearings vs. oil giants - Duterte Daily says:
    March 28, 2018 at 11:44 am

    […] by @philippines_tip https://twitter.com/philippines_tip/status/978733270278881280 Read the rest of the story… (Click link above to read the […]

  2. Climate Hearings Vs. Fossil Fuel Giants - The Crystal Eyes says:
    March 29, 2018 at 8:17 am

    […] Read More: https://www.climatedocket.com/2018/03/27/philippines-human-rights-climate-change/ […]

  3. Weekly Report: 30 March 2018 — CANVAS says:
    March 30, 2018 at 7:39 am

    […] on Human Rights of the Philippines have begun into whether citizens’ human rights have been violated by fossil fuel companies. Testimonies at this trial so far have consisted of accounts of the tragic effects of climate […]

  4. First pre-event study: Climate change boosts rainfall of Hurricane Florence says:
    September 13, 2018 at 4:05 pm

    […] also recently testified before the Human Rights Commission in the Philippines, which is investigating whether fossil fuel companies have committed human rights violations in […]

  5. Can Fossil Fuel Companies Be Held Responsible for Human Rights? The Inter-American Court of Human Rights published an advisory opinion that equates environmental protection with human rights | Rapid Shift says:
    May 31, 2019 at 11:14 am

    […] hearing in London followed previous ones in New York and Manila and, as with the earlier hearings, none of the 47 companies being investigated testified or […]

  6. Big Oil can be liable for violating human rights, Philippines commission rules says:
    December 9, 2019 at 9:51 am

    […] commission held hearings in Manila, New York and London, where evidence was presented by climate scientists, legal experts, academics […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases
  • Climate Suits Grew in 2020, Could Clear Huge Hurdle in 2021

Most Popular

  • Hawaii Joins Trend: Recognizes Constitutional Right to Safe Climate and Environment
  • R.I. Wins Battle to Keep Climate Suit Vs. Big Oil in State Court
  • As San Francisco, Oakland Press Climate Cases, They Pay Homage to Tiny Kivalina
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.