The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Featured / SEC Gives Exxon a Pass on Shareholder Climate Proposal, But Not Chevron
SEC Gives Exxon a Pass on Shareholder Climate Proposal, But Not Chevron

SEC Gives Exxon a Pass on Shareholder Climate Proposal, But Not Chevron

April 10, 2018 Filed Under: Featured

print
By Dana Drugmand

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently responded to shareholder resolutions sent to Chevron and ExxonMobil requesting the oil companies disclose how they plan to align their business models with a low-carbon economy. While the SEC said Exxon could dismiss the proposal, it came to a different conclusion for Chevron, saying Chevron must submit it for consideration at its upcoming shareholder meeting.

As You Sow and Arjuna Capital, groups representing shareholders dedicated to sustainable investing, submitted the proposals to both companies in December. The resolutions propose the companies issue a report describing how they could alter their business models in a decarbonizing economy and reduce dependence on fossil fuels.

The SEC Division of Corporate Finance issued its response to Exxon in March, accepting the company’s argument that it has adequately disclosed steps it is taking to adapt to a low-carbon future. Exxon pointed to recent reports including its “Energy and Carbon Summary” and “2018 Outlook for Energy: A view to 2040” as evidence of these disclosures. “It appears that the Company’s public disclosures compare favorably with the guidelines of the Proposal and that the Company has, therefore, substantially implemented the Proposal,” the SEC wrote.

Those Exxon reports were prepared in response to the first climate-related proposal to succeed after more than two decades of shareholder pressure. In 2017, 62 percent of Exxon shareholders voted to require the company to disclose more about climate risks.

Chevron relied on a different argument than Exxon. It said disclosing how it could adapt its business model could help the plaintiffs in eight climate liability lawsuits against the company. “The Plaintiffs could use the disclosures to their litigation advantage in fact and expert discovery as a source for analogous actions that the Company could have taken,” the company wrote in its no-action request.

The SEC responded on March 28, stating, “We do not believe that the Company may omit the Proposal from its proxy materials.” The SEC also upheld another shareholder proposal asking Chevron to report on its actions to reduce methane emissions. Chevron used the same argument—that the issue is subject in pending litigation—in an attempt to scrap that proposal.

“Chevron argued that our proposals should be banned because this issue, climate change, was being addressed in litigation,” said Danielle Fugere, president of As You Sow. Traditionally, the SEC will allow companies to avoid proposals that deal with a specific issue raised in litigation, she explained. But that was not the case here.

“Chevron’s argument was so broad that had the SEC ruled in Chevron’s favor, pretty much any climate-related issue could be argued would harm their litigation prospects,” she said. “So the SEC, I think, made a correct decision.” She noted that the lawsuits focus on past as well as future behavior, while the shareholder proposal deals with a future transition.

“The clock is ticking on how Big Oil will respond to climate change and Chevron can’t choose to hide behind a stack of litigation,” said Natasha Lamb, managing partner at Arjuna Capital. “Investors have the right to know how the company will adapt its business to climate risks.” 

The low-carbon business model resolution and methane resolution are expected to go to a vote at Chevron’s annual meeting in late May.

Exxon, meanwhile, gets to skirt the issue.

“We’re deeply concerned that ExxonMobil has silenced investor voices at a critical time in the company’s evolution,” Lamb said in response to the SEC decision on the Exxon resolution.

It is not the first time the SEC has issued seemingly conflicting decisions to different companies. In 2015, the SEC let Exxon off the hook in considering a shareholder resolution about restricting exploration projects that could be at risk of being stranded in the future. That same year, it forced Chevron to consider a similar proposal.

According to Fugere, Exxon is unlikely to continue to escape shareholder pressure.

“I’m sure shareholders will continue to ask the company to address this issue of how it’s preparing for a low-carbon economy,” she said. “Right now, Exxon’s [Energy and Carbon Summary] report argues there will still be sufficient demand, and the company will continue to provide oil so long as there’s sufficient demand.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Featured

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Vulnerable Nations Call for Ecocide to Be Recognized As an International Crime
  • U.S. Government Knew Climate Risks in 1970s, Energy Advisory Group Documents Show
  • Oil Company Will Pay $100 Million for Damaging Louisiana Coast
  • EU Families Appeal 'People's Climate Case' Dismissal

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.