The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Colorado Communities File Climate Lawsuits Vs. Two Oil Companies
Colorado Communities File Climate Lawsuits Vs. Two Oil Companies

Colorado Communities File Climate Lawsuits Vs. Two Oil Companies

April 17, 2018 Filed Under: Colorado Lawsuit, Liability Litigation

print
By Dana Drugmand

Several Colorado communities have now joined the growing wave of municipalities taking legal action against fossil fuel companies and seeking compensation for the impacts of climate change.

The city and county of Boulder and the county of San Miguel on Tuesday announced a new lawsuit against ExxonMobil and Suncor, two of the largest oil companies with active operations in Colorado. It’s the first climate liability lawsuit filed by an interior, non-coastal community in the U.S.

The Colorado communities—like coastal communities in California and New York City—are demanding that fossil fuel companies help pay for the costs associated with climate change impacts. They allege that these companies long knew about the danger of unrestrained fossil fuel burning and deliberately downplayed the risk to policymakers and the public. As a result, communities face severe climate impacts and rising costs.

“Climate change impacts are already happening and they are only going to get worse,” said Boulder County Commissioner Elise Jones. “In fact, Colorado is one of the fastest warming states in the nation. Climate change is not just about sea level rise. It affects all of us in the middle of the country as well.”

“Our communities and our taxpayers should not shoulder the cost of climate change adaptation alone. These oil companies need to pay their fair share,” added Boulder Mayor Suzanne Jones.

In Colorado, climate change affects fragile high-altitude ecosystems and hits at the heart of these communities’ local economies, affecting roads and bridges, parks and forests, buildings, farming and agriculture, the ski industry, and public open space. Over the next few decades, Colorado communities are expected to spend more than $100 million to deal with those impacts.

A report presented to the Boulder County Board of County Commissioners last week outlined the likely climate impacts and associated costs. Key findings include an increase in wildfire risk and severe drought, rising public health costs due to extreme heat, increasing strain on urban drainage systems and roads due to flooding, and a greater need for cooling in government-owned buildings.

Boulder County faces an estimated $96 million to $157 million in mitigation costs through 2050, with the city of Boulder facing $16 million to $36 million in costs.  

“Cities and counties just cannot afford to shoulder this burden alone,” Commissioner Jones said.

The city of Boulder, Boulder County and San Miguel County filed the lawsuit in state district court with legal support from EarthRights International, the Niskanen Center, and Hannon Law Firm. The suit brings a public nuisance cause of action against Exxon and Suncor, following similar claims brought by eight California communities and New York City.

“This suit is the first of its kind in the mountain West and it demonstrates that climate change impacts are being felt around the country including here in Colorado,” said Marco Simons, general counsel of EarthRights International.

The Manufacturer’s Accountability Project, an initiative of the National Association of Manufacturers designed to push back against these climate lawsuits, was among the first to respond to the new lawsuit.

“Today in Colorado, we’re seeing another example of trial attorneys attempting to enrich themselves at the expense of manufacturers and manufacturing workers,” the group said in a statement. “These baseless lawsuits do nothing to improve the environment and are a waste of taxpayer resources. While manufacturers are working toward meaningful solutions and are reducing emissions, cities are wasting time suing them for making products Americans rely on for their everyday lives.”

According to Simons, EarthRights International has agreed to take on the case pro bono. He said it is the fossil fuel companies that have profited at the expense of local communities

“For over 50 years, Suncor and Exxon have known that fossil fuels would cause severe climate impacts,” Simons said. “To enhance their own profits, they concealed this knowledge and spread doubt about science they knew to be correct. Now, communities all over this country are left to foot the bill.”

“This lawsuit challenges the reckless behavior of all fossil fuel companies,” said Emma Bray of Earth Guardians and one of the youth plaintiffs in the case Martinez v. Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. “How does the oil and gas industry justify business that will make the Earth uninhabitable?”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Colorado Lawsuit, Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Oil industry tries pushback on climate suits with dubious claims on bonds says:
    April 20, 2018 at 11:39 am

    […] Colorado Communities File Climate Lawsuits Vs. Two Oil Companies […]

  2. Can Calif. climate suits balance fossil fuel use with industry accountability? says:
    June 6, 2018 at 12:34 pm

    […] International. Simons is lead counsel for several Colorado communities bringing climate liability suits against ExxonMobil and Suncor. He said that while nuisance cases in the past often did require that […]

  3. NYC climate case belongs in court, libertarian think tank argues says:
    June 11, 2018 at 9:51 am

    […] this year, the Niskanen Center became co-counsel in a climate liability suit filed by three Colorado communities against two fossil fuel companies, Exxon and […]

  4. Eye roller: ‘Climate Lawsuit Industry’ now has its own magazine | Watts Up With That? says:
    June 12, 2018 at 10:43 am

    […] International. Simons is lead counsel for several Colorado communities bringing climate liability suits against ExxonMobil and Suncor. He said that while nuisance cases in the past often did require that […]

  5. Colorado lawsuit says oil companies conspired to deceive public on climate says:
    June 19, 2018 at 10:14 am

    […] Ucilia Wang The three Colorado communities that filed a climate liability lawsuit against ExxonMobil and Suncor Energy have added a conspiracy allegation to the complaint, which […]

  6. New Democratic AGs could change the face of the climate fight says:
    November 19, 2018 at 11:19 pm

    […] oil and gas producers. Three Colorado communities, including the City and County of Boulder, have filed liability suits against Exxon and Suncor. And it remains unclear whether the ever-litigious Becerra, who in the […]

  7. 2018 in climate liability: When a trend became a wave says:
    December 30, 2018 at 10:09 pm

    […] suits quickly followed from Richmond, Calif.; the city and county of Boulder and San Miguel County, Colo.; King County, Wash.; and Baltimore. Rhode Island also sued fossil fuel companies in July, becoming […]

  8. Exxon reps pose as reporters to query opposing lawyer in climate lawsuit says:
    January 21, 2019 at 2:10 pm

    […] represents the city and county of Boulder and the County of San Miguel in a lawsuit the communities filed last year seeking climate damages from Exxon, potentially runs afoul of ethics rules for both the legal and […]

  9. Hawaii leaders mull potential of climate liability cases says:
    May 17, 2019 at 8:43 am

    […] damages. The state of Rhode Island, cities of New York, Baltimore, Oakland and San Francisco and Boulder as well as counties in California and Colorado are among those that have filed lawsuits against the […]

  10. Colorado climate liability suit sent to state court, latest defeat for Big Oil says:
    September 6, 2019 at 12:21 pm

    […] federal judge has ruled that a climate liability suit against Exxon and Suncor by three Colorado municipalities belongs in state court, handing a defeat […]

  11. Oil companies, denied stay in Colorado climate case, keep trying says:
    October 9, 2019 at 9:52 pm

    […] the suit, filed last year, the communities assert state law claims of public nuisance, private nuisance, trespass, […]

  12. Oil companies ask Supreme Court to pre-empt Colorado's climate case says:
    October 21, 2019 at 8:30 pm

    […] to climate change, but deliberately downplayed that risk to policymakers and the public. In the suit, which was filed last year, the communities assert state law claims of public nuisance, private […]

  13. Exxon, Suncor argue for dismissal of Colorado climate suit says:
    December 11, 2019 at 11:55 am

    […] to dismiss the case late Monday in Boulder County District Court, where the case was initially filed in April 2018. As in other climate liability cases brought by municipal governments against fossil fuel […]

  14. Newest Climate Liability Suits: Climate Justice Is Racial Justice - The Climate Docket says:
    June 30, 2020 at 2:10 pm

    […] on the East Coast (Baltimore, New York City and now Washington) as well as landlocked communities (Colorado, […]

  15. Big Oil Again Asks SCOTUS to Keep a Climate Suit in Federal Court - The Climate Docket says:
    December 10, 2020 at 11:01 am

    […] Colorado case was filed in state court in 2018 by the City of Boulder and the counties of Boulder and San Miguel, claiming […]

  16. Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies' Attempt to Move Climate Case - The Climate Docket says:
    January 28, 2021 at 5:15 pm

    […] the suit, which was filed in 2018, the communities say the companies violated state laws involving public […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Exxon Continues to Fund 'Science' Group Steeped in Climate Denial and Delay
  • Study Estimates Seawalls to Protect U.S. Coast Will Cost $400 Billion
  • Climate Activists Win Necessity Defense Case in London
  • Vulnerable Nations Call for Ecocide to Be Recognized As an International Crime

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.