The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / International / Shell Rejects Climate Demands, Faces a Lawsuit in the Netherlands
Shell Rejects Climate Demands, Faces a Lawsuit in the Netherlands

Shell Rejects Climate Demands, Faces a Lawsuit in the Netherlands

May 30, 2018 Filed Under: International, Liability Litigation

print
By Karen Savage

Royal Dutch Shell has rejected demands from an activist group in the Netherlands that the company cut back on oil and gas production. It is the first step in what will become legal action by the group aimed at forcing the oil giant to reverse course on producing a product that is helping drive climate change.

Earlier this year, Friends of the Earth Netherlands/Milieudefensie sent a letter to Shell demanding it align its business model with the Paris Climate Agreement by immediately reducing fossil fuel production and eliminating its greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Under Dutch law, that letter is required and Shell’s refusal means the group may proceed to filing a lawsuit.

Shell responded on Monday with a lengthy letter outlining its position on climate change, but refused to address the group’s specific demands.

“We do not believe these claims have merit; nor do we consider that the courts provide the right forum to advance the global energy transition,” wrote Linda Szymanski, company secretary for Shell.

Szymanski said Shell “welcomes and strongly supports the goals of the Paris Agreement” and pointed to the company’s recent report, called the Sky scenario, which “illustrates a technically possible but challenging pathway” toward achieving those goals.

Critics say Shell has failed to take concrete steps toward curbing climate change. A shareholder resolution to adopt emissions reduction targets was rejected at Shell’s annual meeting last week.

Roger Cox, attorney for Milieudefensie, said Shell’s business model remains at odds with the climate agreement.

“Shell reiterates the marginal steps it takes to protect the climate that we are already familiar with, but does not address what the legal action is about: stopping dangerous climate change,” said Cox, who successfully led the Urgenda Foundation case in 2015, in which a Dutch court ruled the government must curtail the country’s emissions to address the climate crisis.

Milieudefensie has registered more than 11,000 people as co-plaintiffs and is inviting all Dutch citizens to register. The organization is not seeking financial compensation but is demanding Shell stop contributing to climate change.

In 1988, a Shell report called The Greenhouse Effect estimated that its products accounted for 4 percent of global carbon emissions in 1984.

Estimates in that document—one of a trove of 38 recently discovered and released to the public by Jelmer Mommers, a climate and energy journalist for the Dutch news organization De Correspondent—mirror estimates in the Carbon Majors report, which was compiled and released last year by the Climate Accountability Institute and listed Shell as sixth in the world in cumulative greenhouse gas emissions between 1854 and 2010.

Shell spokesperson Sally Donaldson said the company has long recognized the challenge of balancing climate change and the role of energy in people’s quality of life.

“We strongly support the agreement in Paris to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius or less, but we believe climate change is a complex societal challenge that should be addressed through sound government policy and cultural change to drive low-carbon choices for businesses and consumers, not by the courts,” Donaldson said.

Milieudefensie director Donald Pols said Shell misunderstands the legal system.

“If companies or governments act in violation of the law, then it becomes a matter for the judge. People are now increasingly seeking justice for the pollution that companies like Shell cause,” Pols said.

“It is illegal to set fire to someone’s house. We believe it is also illegal for fossil fuel companies to knowingly burn our common home,” said Sara Shaw, a Friends of the Earth International campaigner.

“Today the global call for climate justice is growing louder.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: International, Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Shell Rejects Group’s Climate Demands, Faces Lawsuit in Netherlands | Climate Change says:
    May 30, 2018 at 1:47 pm

    […] Read original story […]

  2. Shell Rejects Climate Demands, Faces a Lawsuit in the Netherlands – Netizen24com says:
    May 31, 2018 at 6:56 am

    […] Google News Netherlands | Netizen 24 […]

  3. Document shows Shell aimed to profit from melting Arctic says:
    October 24, 2018 at 9:06 pm

    […] The company is already facing legal action based on a trove of documents about Shell’s knowledge of climate change unearthed by Jelmer Mommers of the Dutch news organization De Correspondent. Friends of the Earth Netherlands / Milieudefensie delivered a liability letter to the Dutch oil giant demanding it cut back on its oil and gas production to align with the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement. When the company refused, the group sued. […]

  4. French communities demand climate action from oil giant Total says:
    October 25, 2018 at 11:05 am

    […] in the Netherlands, Royal Dutch Shell faces a lawsuit from an environmental advocacy group over its failure to address its role in climate […]

  5. Shell faces lawsuit in the Netherlands, a new legal front in climate battle says:
    February 12, 2019 at 10:45 pm

    […] responded to the Milieudefensie letter last May explaining its position on climate change and calling the potential lawsuit “meritless,” arguing that courts should not dictate energy policy. This […]

  6. OilWire Issue #6: 1.5°C = No new fossil fuels; Dutch ruling puts Shell on notice; Pipeline blast rocks Nigeria – Global Gas & Oil Network says:
    March 1, 2019 at 3:29 pm

    […] Dutch court is also going to hear arguments in a lawsuit that Friends of the Earth Netherlands/Milieudefensie is bringing against Shell. That suit seeks to […]

  7. Shell sued in Netherlands for insufficient action on climate change says:
    April 12, 2019 at 3:43 pm

    […] gas production and align its business strategy with the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement. Shell rejected those demands, saying it “strongly supports” the goals of the Paris Agreement and […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases
  • Climate Suits Grew in 2020, Could Clear Huge Hurdle in 2021

Most Popular

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • French Government Sued for Inadequate Climate Action
  • Vulnerable Nations Call for Ecocide to Be Recognized As an International Crime
  • What Oil Companies Knew About Climate Change and When: A Timeline
  • Baltimore Becomes Latest City to Sue Fossil Fuel Companies for Climate Damages

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.