The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / International / Netherlands Works to Overturn Landmark Urgenda Climate Ruling
Netherlands Works to Overturn Landmark Urgenda Climate Ruling

Netherlands Works to Overturn Landmark Urgenda Climate Ruling

May 30, 2018 Filed Under: International, Liability Litigation

print
By Ucilia Wang

Update: Following the hearing, the Hague Court of Appeal said it would announce its decision on the government appeal on Oct. 9.

A landmark climate case in the Netherlands, the first to rule that a government has a constitutional duty to protect its citizens from the impacts of climate change, is heading back to court on Monday for a hearing on the Dutch government’s appeal.

The Dutch court’s ruling in  Urgenda Foundation v. The State of Netherlands in 2015 ordered the government to take more aggressive action to cut carbon emissions. It inspired similar lawsuits around the world from activist groups and citizens trying to compel governments to act more decisively on the climate crisis.  

The lawsuit was filed by the Urgenda Foundation and 886 citizens in 2013, seeking to hold the government accountable for its promises to aggressively cut emissions at a time when the country was falling behind in reaching its renewable energy goals.

“The case completely changed the political debate on climate policy. Now it is the top topic in Dutch politics,” said Dennis van Berkel, legal counsel of Urgenda Foundation in Amsterdam. “The case created an enormous amount of hope around the world for people who lost faith in the political process.”

While the government has made progress in cutting emissions—van Berkel said it had reduced them 13 percent by the end of 2017—it is unclear whether it is on track to reach the 25 percent reduction by 2020 that was ordered by the Hague District Court in its 2015 ruling.  

The government has promised to shut down all coal power plants by 2030 and build more offshore wind farms. But it also appealed the Urgenda decision to the Hague Court of Appeal because it says no national or international law requires it to hit emissions reduction targets and it should have the flexibility to change the target. It also said the court shouldn’t interfere with the government’s process of setting climate policy.

The government did not respond to request for comment on Monday’s hearing.

The lower court’s ruling inspired lawsuits subsequently filed in countries such as Norway, Pakistan, Ireland, Belgium, Colombia, Switzerland and New Zealand.

Similar cases also have showed up in the U.S., including two pending cases, Juliana v. United States and Clean Air Council v. United States.

“Urgenda was among that small number of cases that really uncorked the bottle of climate litigation” said Carroll Muffett, president of the Center for International Environmental Law, an advocacy group in Washington, D.C. “Regardless of whether the Dutch government were to succeed in this appeal, it’s not going to put the genie back in the bottle.”

Before filing the lawsuit, Urgenda had asked the government to agree to cut emissions by 40 percent from the 1990 levels by 2020, an upper-end target for developed countries that was recommended by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to keep global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius from pre-industrial levels.

The 2-degree marker became one of the goals in the Paris Climate Agreement, which set a more ambitious aim of 1.5 degrees. The agreement was signed by 195 countries, with each setting its own voluntary goals for emissions reductions.

In response to Urgenda’s request in 2012, the Dutch government said it would work with the European Union and other countries to come up with better plans for all involved, but it didn’t pledge the 40 percent reduction.

Shortly after the ruling, the Dutch government said it would work to meet the 25 percent mandate even as it appealed the case.

The Dutch government said it disagreed with how the court defined the government’s “duty of care” to protect the environment for its people.

That phrase frames the core of the decision, which asserts that the government has a legal obligation to live up to its commitment to cut emissions.  

“What’s remarkable about the Urgenda decision is the court said it must assume that the government takes these commitments with the intent to meet them. Therefore, these commitments you’ve undertaken help us define what your duty of care is,” Muffett said.

“Soaring speeches are cheap. Real climate action is hard,” Muffett added.

After the upcoming hearing on Monday, the Hague Court of Appeal will issue a ruling, likely by the end of the year, van Berkel said. The case could make its way to the country’s supreme court on further appeal.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: International, Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Netherlands Works to Overturn Landmark Urgenda Climate Ruling – I Care Movement says:
    May 24, 2018 at 7:46 pm

    […] Curated from: https://www.climatedocket.com/2018/05/24/urgenda-climate-ruling-netherlands/ […]

  2. Netherlands Works to Overturn Landmark Urgenda Climate Ruling | MFA News says:
    May 24, 2018 at 11:11 pm

    […] Netherlands Works to Overturn Landmark Urgenda Climate Ruling  Climate Liability News […]

  3. 2018 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #21 | Climate Change says:
    May 26, 2018 at 11:51 am

    […] Netherlands Works to Overturn Landmark Urgenda Climate Ruling by Ucilia Wang, Climate Liability News, May 24, 2018 […]

  4. Shell rejects climate demands, faces a lawsuit in the Netherlands says:
    May 30, 2018 at 11:35 am

    […] Netherlands Works to Overturn Landmark Urgenda Climate Ruling […]

  5. Links 6/1/18 | AlltopCash.com says:
    June 1, 2018 at 4:04 pm

    […] Netherlands Works to Overturn Landmark Urgenda Climate Ruling Climate Liability News […]

  6. Canada promises climate progress and buys a pipeline instead says:
    June 4, 2018 at 11:36 am

    […] Netherlands Works to Overturn Landmark Urgenda Climate Ruling […]

  7. In latest climate suit, families demand tougher EU climate action says:
    June 7, 2018 at 8:01 am

    […] Netherlands Works to Overturn Landmark Urgenda Climate Ruling […]

  8. Final appeal in historic Urgenda case may hinge on human rights says:
    May 28, 2019 at 8:39 am

    […] case has already had an impact not just in the Netherlands but worldwide, inspiring lawsuits in several countries, including the […]

  9. Giustizia per il clima, giustizia per i cittadini | A Sud ONLUS says:
    November 15, 2019 at 9:14 am

    […] recente il governo olandese ha deciso di appellare la decisione, la cui implementazione è quindi al momento ferma. Nonostante ciò, il caso ha rappresentato […]

  10. Historic Urgenda climate ruling upheld by Dutch Supreme Court says:
    January 30, 2020 at 4:54 pm

    […] Dutch government previously said it would comply with the ruling, but disagreed with the courts’ opinion that it had a legal duty to protect the environment for its […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases
  • Climate Suits Grew in 2020, Could Clear Huge Hurdle in 2021

Most Popular

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • French Government Sued for Inadequate Climate Action
  • Vulnerable Nations Call for Ecocide to Be Recognized As an International Crime
  • What Oil Companies Knew About Climate Change and When: A Timeline
  • Baltimore Becomes Latest City to Sue Fossil Fuel Companies for Climate Damages

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.