The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Youth Climate Case in Washington State Dismissed by King County Judge
Youth Climate Case in Washington State Dismissed by King County Judge

Youth Climate Case in Washington State Dismissed by King County Judge

August 15, 2018 Filed Under: Liability Litigation

print
By Karen Savage

While a youth-led climate lawsuit continues making its way through federal court, a state-level suit filed by 13 young people against the state of Washington was dismissed by a judge on Tuesday.

The case, Aji P. v. State of Washington, is one of several suits filed in state courts by young people claiming the states are violating their constitutional rights by perpetuating an energy and transportation system dependent on fossil fuels.

But King County Superior Judge Michael Scott sent this one to an early defeat, ruling that these issues should not to be resolved by a court, but are political questions best addressed by the legislative and executive branches.

Andrew Welle, co-counsel for the young plaintiffs, said they would appeal.

“The United States Supreme Court recently ruled that similar claims against the federal government must advance to the trial stage, affirming that the judiciary has a duty to resolve constitutional claims of this nature,” Welle said. “Given the urgency of climate change and the important constitutional issues involved, the political branches of government cannot be immune from liability for the constitutional climate crisis of their own making.”

The suits being pursued at a state level are hoping to follow in the footsteps of Juliana v. United States, a constitutional rights case by 21 young people against the federal government that is scheduled for trial in U.S. District Court in October.

The Washington suit asked for an injunction to force the state to develop an enforceable and science-based climate recovery plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and protect the climate. If granted, the court was asked to monitor the state’s progress toward meeting the plan’s goals, similar to court monitoring in the landmark civil rights decision Brown v. Board of Education and the prison overcrowding case, Brown v. Plata.

The young people in Washington were hoping to follow the success of the young plaintiffs in Foster v. Ecology. That ruling in 2014 recognized the right to a healthy environment and led to the adoption of Washington’s Clean Air Rule in 2016. Despite that victory, the new suit  alleges that the state continues to allow dangerous levels of greenhouse gas emissions.

“On a day when the sun in Seattle is shrouded in smoke from wildfires, the youth plaintiffs are devastated that Judge Scott declined to give them an opportunity to present their constitutional claims in a court of law,” said Andrea Rogers, senior staff attorney for Our Children’s Trust, which supported the suit.

Our Children’s Trust said that given the “pronounced departure from proper judicial procedure,” it would issue a formal statement on Wednesday.

“By deferring to the Executive and Legislative branches of government that have affirmatively placed these plaintiffs in harm’s way, without an appropriate legal analysis, the court has unfortunately chosen not to engage to protect the rights of these plaintiffs, to their detriment,” Rogers said.

Air quality alerts have been issued for much of Oregon and Washington due to wildfires that have burned a combined total of more than 467 square miles in the two states.

“This summer alone, increasingly dangerous wildfires throughout the United States have destroyed communities and families, polluted and clouded our air, and taken human lives,” said 17-year-old Wren Wagenbach, a plaintiff from Seattle.

“I haven’t been able to leave the house without my inhaler this week because wildfire smoke has settled in Seattle. This is not the environment I believe any American deserves.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. The Banner, Vol. 4, No. 35 – Then They Fight You - The Banner says:
    August 28, 2018 at 12:41 am

    […] liability for the constitutional climate crisis of their own making.”…—Karen Savage, “Youth climate case in Washington State dismissed by judge,” Climate Liability News, […]

  2. The Banner, Vol. 4, No. 36 – Defending the Indefensible - The Banner says:
    September 4, 2018 at 5:11 am

    […] liability for the constitutional climate crisis of their own making.”…—Karen Savage, “Youth climate case in Washington State dismissed by judge,” Climate Liability News, […]

  3. Latest climate suit vs. U.S. government filed by animal rights group says:
    October 22, 2018 at 9:18 pm

    […] similar case, filed by 13 teenagers in the state of Washington, was dismissed in August when a county judge ruled that the issues in the case were political and not legal in […]

  4. Alaska judge dismisses youth climate suit vs. state government says:
    November 1, 2018 at 4:09 pm

    […] dismissal follows a similar one in Washington in August, when Superior Court Judge Michael Scott ruled against the youth plaintiffs in Aji P. v. State of Washington. Scott said climate change presents a […]

  5. Colorado can ignore health, climate impacts of fracking, court rules says:
    January 14, 2019 at 10:37 pm

    […] natural resources based on the public trust doctrine. Other cases brought by young people in Washington and Alaska were dismissed, but are likely to be […]

  6. As Himalayas melt, US kids in Juliana case, Youth v. Gov demand a climate recovery plan, and in the interim, an injunction against fossil fuel permitting | Rapid Shift says:
    February 19, 2019 at 12:41 pm

    […] Youth Climate Case in Washington State Dismissed by King County Judge […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads
  • What Oil Companies Knew About Climate Change and When: A Timeline
  • Judge Agrees to Divest from Exxon Before New York's Climate Fraud Case
  • Youth Climate Case in Washington State Dismissed by King County Judge
  • Battling for Big Oil: Manufacturing Trade Group Leads Assault on Climate Suits

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.