The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Latest Climate Suit Vs. U.S. Government Launched by Animal Rights Group
Latest Climate Suit Vs. U.S. Government Launched by Animal Rights Group

Latest Climate Suit Vs. U.S. Government Launched by Animal Rights Group

October 22, 2018 Filed Under: Liability Litigation

print
By Seamus McGraw

Does the U.S. Constitution, with its guarantees of liberty and privacy, also impose an obligation on the part of the federal government to protect those wild places where liberty and privacy can best be enjoyed?

That is the question the Animal Legal Defense Fund is hoping to test with a groundbreaking lawsuit filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Oregon.

The suit marks a unique twist in an emerging series of so-called Atmospheric Trust cases, in which defendants allege that actions by the government have helped fuel climate change, which has degraded the environment and violated individual rights. In this case, the suit alleges Americans’ constitutionally protected right to “to seek liberty and privacy in the wilderness . . . the right to be left alone . . . has been impeded substantially by climate change,” said Carter Dillard, senior policy advisor for the Animal Legal Defense Fund.

“The argument is pretty straightforward in that the government’s actions and inactions with regard to climate change are impacting wilderness areas in dramatic ways and in some cases in life-threatening ways,” Dillard said.

In effect, Dillard said, the suit contends that those changes, and the government policies that contribute to them—including subsidies to the fossil fuel industry and agricultural interests—have already harmed the plaintiffs, among them scientists, wildlife advocates and people who enjoy the outdoors. Dillard said those harms are especially clear in areas designated as protected under the Wilderness Act.

“Areas established by the Wilderness Act are protected based on their solitude,” Dillard said. “The very concept of wilderness has to do with solitude. That . . . matches up with documentation at the foundation of the country that refers to the right to be free from others.

“If you have the right to be left alone, and the quintessence of being left alone is being in the wilderness and if that area is being degraded, if not attacked, by our own federal government so that people can’t be left alone due to the unwanted influence of climate change, isn’t the government violating the right to freedom and liberty?” Dillard said.

The lawsuit, spearheaded by Jessica Blome of Greenfire Law of Berkeley, Calif., names the Department of Interior, the Department of Agriculture and other agencies as defendants.

The suit is the latest in a series of cases brought by activists alleging that the federal government’s failure to address climate change and to adequately protect essential public resources violate life, liberty and property rights.

Monday’s lawsuit was filed just three days after Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts issued a stay in the landmark Juliana v. United States case in which 21 young people sued the federal government alleging that it had known for decades that carbon emissions endangered the climate and yet allowed and encouraged fossil fuel production to continue, thus violating the plaintiffs’ right to life, liberty and property.

The court stayed the proceedings to give the plaintiffs time to respond to the government’s motion to halt the case before its scheduled trial on Oct. 29. The government is asking for an extraordinary writ of mandamus, a rarely granted request for a higher court to overrule a lower court before a trial or verdict. The Justice Department is arguing that the trial is too burdensome for the government and it would threaten the separation of powers.

A similar case, filed by 13 teenagers in the state of Washington, was dismissed in August when a county judge ruled that the issues in the case were political and not legal in nature.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. The Banner, Vol. 4, No. 43 – Rebelling against Extinction - The Banner says:
    October 23, 2018 at 2:54 am

    […] clear in areas designated as protected under the Wilderness Act.…—Seamus McGraw, “Latest climate suit vs. U.S. government filed by animal rights group,” Climate Liability News, […]

  2. 100 Billion Animals Farmed; and Your 5-A-Day - Sentient Media says:
    October 23, 2018 at 3:56 pm

    […] ✊ The United States government’s inaction on climate change is affecting animals in wilderness areas across the country. Finally, an animal rights advocacy group is taking them to court. [Climate Liability News] […]

  3. Earth’s Mass Extinction: How You Can Stop It - Having Kids says:
    May 6, 2019 at 11:16 pm

    […] human right to nature. Human freedom begins with the absence of human power, or nature. That right to nature overrides the right others may mistakenly feel they have to harm nature. Take action to defend your […]

  4. Government argues for dismissal of climate, wilderness suit says:
    May 23, 2019 at 1:53 pm

    […] Department of Justice filed a motion to dismiss a groundbreaking climate case brought last October by two groups that claim the federal government is violating their […]

  5. Federal judge dismisses climate suit seeking a 'right to wilderness' says:
    August 1, 2019 at 12:31 pm

    […] global phenomenon that affects every citizen of the world,” a federal judge in Oregon dismissed a lawsuit filed last year by groups alleging that the federal government is violating their Constitutional […]

  6. Groups appeal dismissal of 'right to wilderness' climate suit says:
    August 20, 2019 at 5:17 pm

    […] lawsuit alleges that by supporting the fossil fuel industry and failing to take action on climate change, […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases
  • Climate Suits Grew in 2020, Could Clear Huge Hurdle in 2021

Most Popular

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Hawaii Joins Trend: Recognizes Constitutional Right to Safe Climate and Environment
  • R.I. Wins Battle to Keep Climate Suit Vs. Big Oil in State Court
  • Carbon Majors Can Be Held Liable for Human Rights Violations, Philippines Commission Rules
  • As San Francisco, Oakland Press Climate Cases, They Pay Homage to Tiny Kivalina

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.