The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Exxon Climate Investigation / Judge Agrees to Divest from Exxon Before New York’s Climate Fraud Case
Judge Agrees to Divest from Exxon Before New York’s Climate Fraud Case

Judge Agrees to Divest from Exxon Before New York’s Climate Fraud Case

November 8, 2018 Filed Under: Exxon Climate Investigation

print
By Dana Drugmand

A New York judge agreed to sell his stock in ExxonMobil to resolve a potential conflict of interest flagged by the New York attorney general’s office after it filed its lawsuit alleging the oil giant misled investors over climate change risk.

Responding to the state’s request that he recuse himself from the case, Judge Barry R. Ostrager said in a hearing Wednesday in New York Supreme Court that he would sell his Exxon stock if New York withdraws its request and waives any claim of conflict of interest.

Ostrager, 71, had held up to $250,000 in Exxon shares, according to the judge’s latest financial disclosure form filed with the Ethics Commission for the Unified Court System.

New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood recently filed the suit against Exxon under the state’s Martin Act, alleging the company deceived and defrauded investors by not being transparent about the financial risk it faces from climate change.

Ostrager had presided over the subpoena proceedings throughout the state’s investigation of Exxon, which lasted more than two years, and both sides had waived objections to Ostrager’s financial disclosures during the investigation.

But the AG’s office argued that Ostrager could not be impartial in overseeing the lawsuit given his interest as an Exxon shareholder. “A justice who is an Exxon shareholder, or was an Exxon shareholder during the period in question, would have economic interests in both the subject matter in controversy and in the party defendant,” the letter said.

When Ostrager offered to sell his Exxon stock at Wednesday’s hearing, the state attorneys initially tried to press their case for recusal. Ostrager then became annoyed and called the state’s request “gamesmanship and judge-shopping.” He said the state could appeal his decision to a higher court.

But following a short break, the state attorneys said they would accept Ostrager’s offer.

Manisha Sheth, New York’s deputy attorney general for economic justice, said the state would accept the proposal and would not seek appeal, “assuming your honor divests your honor’s shares in Exxon as well as any interest in the proceeding.”  

Ostrager indicated at the end of the hearing that he wants the trial to conclude in 2019.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Exxon Climate Investigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Judge Agrees to Divest from Exxon Before New York’s Climate Fraud Case – Climate Change Resources says:
    November 9, 2018 at 12:02 am

    […] Americans voted overwhelmingly to protect wild places […]

  2. As New York Takes Exxon to Court, Big Oil’s Strategy Against Climate Lawsuits Is Slowly Unveiled – Enjeux énergies et environnement says:
    November 8, 2019 at 5:42 pm

    […] begin with, Judge Ostrager had to divest himself of $250,000 in Exxon stock in order to try it and scolded the attorney general’s team for […]

  3. As New York Takes Exxon to Court, Big Oil’s Strategy Against Climate Lawsuits Is Slowly Unveiled – Breaking Worldwide News says:
    November 10, 2019 at 7:28 am

    […] begin with, Judge Ostrager had to divest himself of $250,000 in Exxon stock in order to try it and scolded the attorney general’s team for trying […]

  4. As New York Takes Exxon to Court, Big Oil’s Strategy Against Climate Lawsuits Is Slowly Unveiled – Viral News Connection says:
    November 10, 2019 at 8:28 am

    […] begin with, Judge Ostrager had to divest himself of $250,000 in Exxon stock in order to try it and scolded the attorney general’s team for trying […]

  5. Energy, land and law: This year, it’s personal - News THE Today says:
    January 5, 2020 at 8:25 pm

    […] argue that “the company failed to manage the risks in the way it promised.” But the judge, who refused to recuse himself after it was revealed that he held $250,000 in Exxon stock, dismissed the case on […]

  6. Energy, Land and Law: This Year, It’s Personal - Africa Sustainability Matters says:
    January 8, 2020 at 3:10 am

    […] company failed to manage the risks in the way it promised.” But the judge, who refused to recuse himself after it was revealed that he held $250,000 in Exxon stock, dismissed the […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Climate Case Gets Green Light from European Union Court
  • Exxon Continues to Fund 'Science' Group Steeped in Climate Denial and Delay
  • Pacific Islands Group Pushes for International Court Ruling on Climate and Human Rights
  • Study Estimates Seawalls to Protect U.S. Coast Will Cost $400 Billion
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.