The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Federal Court Keeps Youth Climate Case on Hold Pending Government Appeal
Federal Court Keeps Youth Climate Case on Hold Pending Government Appeal

Federal Court Keeps Youth Climate Case on Hold Pending Government Appeal

November 21, 2018 Filed Under: Liability Litigation

print
By Karen Savage

U.S. District Court Judge Ann Aiken has approved another appeal by the Trump administration in Juliana v. United States, keeping the landmark youth-led climate suit paused while the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals considers the government’s attempts to stop the case before trial.

While Aiken argued in her ruling on Wednesday that the case would be better situated for appeal after trial, not before, she acknowledged the Ninth Circuit’s suggestion that she reconsider her previous denial of an interlocutory appeal—a rare legal maneuver in which a higher court reviews a lower court’s decisions before a trial has concluded.

The Juliana trial had been scheduled had been scheduled to begin in Aiken’s courtroom on Oct. 29 before the latest volley of government appeals succeeded in delaying it.

Aiken said she did not make the decision lightly.

“This Court stands by its prior rulings on jurisdictional and merits issues, as well as its belief that this case would be better served by further factual development at trial,” Aiken wrote.

Philip Gregory, co-counsel for the plaintiffs, said given the “extreme urgency of the climate crisis” he believes the Ninth Circuit will ultimately allow the trial to proceed.

“As Judge Aiken stated in her Order, given the sheer volume of evidence submitted by Plaintiffs, trial presents ‘the most efficient course for both the parties and the judiciary.’ We believe the Ninth Circuit will agree with Judge Aiken that ‘this case would be better served by … trial’,” Gregory said in a statement.

Julia Olson, who also represents the young plaintiffs, said the government has repeatedly made baseless claims, used repetitive appeals to delay discovery and trial and made unfounded claims of ‘irreparable harm’ to the government if a trial were to proceed.

“These claims are not supported by a shred of evidence,” Olson said. “In contrast, our youth have thousands of pages of evidence and the best experts on the planet ready to testify under oath that these plaintiffs’ lives, liberties, and property are threatened by these defendants, that their world is being endangered and destroyed as we speak.”

The case has survived numerous attempts by the government to dismiss it since it was originally originally filed in 2015. The 21 young plaintiffs, who from around the country, argue that the federal government is violating their Constitutional rights to life, liberty and property by promoting an energy system that exacerbates climate change. They are asking for a science-based program to reduce carbon emissions and protect the climate for future generations.

Miko Vergun, a 17-year-old plaintiff from Beaverton, Ore., said the Trump administration is disregarding her future by pressing for further delays.  

“We all fight for things that affect our lives and that we believe in, but this is a fight to survive and we have no time to lose to more delays,” Vergun said.  

“Climate change affects where I was born in the Marshall Islands and where I now live in Oregon. It’s like wherever I go, I can’t escape it. I feel like the people leading this country are failing young people like me.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Federal Court Keeps Youth Climate Case on Hold Pending Government Appeal – Climate Change Resources says:
    November 23, 2018 at 12:51 am

    […] Why ‘flammable ice’ could be the future of energy […]

  2. 2018 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #47 | Climate Change says:
    November 24, 2018 at 1:43 pm

    […] Federal Court Keeps Youth Climate Case on Hold Pending Government Appeal by Karen Savage, Climate Liability News, Nov 21, 2018 […]

  3. Young climate plaintiffs urge judge to let their case proceed says:
    December 6, 2018 at 7:30 am

    […] Federal Court Keeps Youth Climate Case on Hold Pending Government Appeal […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Climate Case Gets Green Light from European Union Court
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads
  • Toronto Will Explore Suing Big Oil for Climate Costs
  • Dutch Court Upholds Urgenda, Says Government Must Reduce Emissions
  • What Oil Companies Knew About Climate Change and When: A Timeline

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.