The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Kids Climate Case Plaintiffs Ask Court to Halt New Federal Fossil Fuel Leases
Kids Climate Case Plaintiffs Ask Court to Halt New Federal Fossil Fuel Leases

Kids Climate Case Plaintiffs Ask Court to Halt New Federal Fossil Fuel Leases

February 8, 2019 Filed Under: Liability Litigation

print

By Marco Poggio

Twenty-one young Americans suing the United States government for knowingly exacerbating climate change filed a motion to stop the federal government from leasing out federal land and offshore areas to fossil fuel companies for oil, gas and coal extraction. It also demanded a halt in federal approvals of new fossil fuel infrastructure.

The motion, filed late Thursday with the with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, asked for a temporary injunction to freeze all fossil fuel infrastructure permits while an early appeal of their case, Juliana v. United States, is being considered.

“At a minimum, this injunction would apply to the approximately 100 new fossil fuel infrastructure projects poised for federal permits, including pipelines, export facilities, and coal and liquefied natural gas terminal,” the motion said.

The young plaintiffs asked the court to issue the injunction before March 20, when the government will offer about 78 million acres of unleased areas in federal waters of the Gulf of Mexico.

In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs, who range in age from 11 to 22, allege the U.S. government is depriving them of their constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property with an energy policy that promotes fossil fuel development. The motion addresses the policy of leasing lands for oil and other fossil fuel extraction. Science has shown the burning of fossil fuels is the overwhelming driver of climate change, which leads to sea level rise, more extreme drought, wildfires and storms..

“I used to be able to swim at Kapa‘a Beach near my old house, but there is no beach left due to sea level rise,” said Journey Zephier, 19-year-old plaintiff from Hawaii, in a declaration attached to the motion. “Watching the beaches erode away and disappear brings me deep emotional pain.”

The Department of Justice declined to comment on the motion.

The case, originally filed in 2015, is awaiting a hearing in the Ninth Circuit, which made the unusual move of agreeing to an interlocutory appeal, a rare review of a case before trial. The court agreed in December to hear the Trump administration’s arguments that the case should not proceed and agreed to expedite the process. The Trump administration filed its opening brief on Friday, arguing the young plaintiffs have no Constitutional right to a safe climate. The Juliana plaintiffs have until Feb. 22 to respond.

A host of international experts, including economists, scientists and armed forces officials who worked on the case pro-bono, submitted declarations to the court supporting the new motion.

“An injunction on future leases and mining permits for extracting coal on federal public lands and on future leases for offshore oil and gas exploration and extraction activities, alongside enjoining new fossil fuel infrastructure requiring federal approval will prevent, not cause, economic harm,” said Joseph Stiglitz, an economist and Nobel Prize laureate.

“Defendants control and dictate the U.S. national energy policy in a myriad of ways. For example, they provide billions of dollars annually in direct and indirect subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. The economic impacts of these actions are deleterious to Youth Plaintiffs and the Nation as a whole.”

Lee Gunn, a retired vice-admiral and former Inspector General of the Navy, said climate change is a “threat multiplier” and a “catalyst for conflict” and called it “the most serious national security threat facing our Nation today.”

Julia Olson, executive director and chief legal counsel of Our Children’s Trust and co-counsel for the young plaintiffs, called the government’s development of more fossil fuels “extremely reckless” and causes further harm.

“It is up to the courts to preserve plaintiffs’ rights, and minimize further irreparable harm to these young people, during the pendency of this interlocutory appeal,” Olson said.

The motion mentions 60 new oil and gas pipelines, 32 new liquefied natural gas and coal terminals, and one new deepwater port oil export facility awaiting federal approval among the projects the government is expected to approve. That infrastructure would lock in more use of fossil fuels, contributing to an increase in CO2 pollution, causing even more climate change

Describing his plight to the court, Nick Venner, a 17-year-old plaintiff from Colorado, said carbon emissions trigger frequent wildfires in the summer and poor air quality in the winter in his area. As a result of such unhealthy conditions, he suffers frequent asthma attacks and strong coughs that cause him to miss school.

“I have asthma. The wildfire smoke makes it impossible for me to exercise and sometimes I can’t even go outside at all on particularly poor air quality days,” he said. “I want to emphasize the urgent nature of what we face and what this case is about. It’s irreversible!”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. The Energy 202: Green New Deal is already sparking debate over nuclear energy – USA News Hub says:
    February 11, 2019 at 8:36 am

    […] — Climate kids suing federal government ask court to block fossil fuel production: The nearly two dozen kids and young adults suing the government over a lack of climate action are calling on a court to stop the government from granting permits for drilling on federal land and offshore regions. In a motion filed last Thursday with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the group called for a temporary injunction of such approvals while an appeal of their case against the government is being considered, Climate Liability News reports. […]

  2. The Energy 202: Green New Deal is already sparking debate over nuclear energy – USA All Americans NEWS™ says:
    February 11, 2019 at 8:43 am

    […] — Climate kids suing federal government ask court to block fossil fuel production: The nearly two dozen kids and young adults suing the government over a lack of climate action are calling on a court to stop the government from granting permits for drilling on federal land and offshore regions. In a motion filed last Thursday with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the group called for a temporary injunction of such approvals while an appeal of their case against the government is being considered, Climate Liability News reports. […]

  3. The Energy 202: Green New Deal is already sparking debate over nuclear energy | IdubaiNews.com says:
    February 11, 2019 at 8:59 am

    […] — Climate kids suing federal government ask court to block fossil fuel production: The nearly two dozen kids and young adults suing the government over a lack of climate action are calling on a court to stop the government from granting permits for drilling on federal land and offshore regions. In a motion filed last Thursday with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the group called for a temporary injunction of such approvals while an appeal of their case against the government is being considered, Climate Liability News reports. […]

  4. 2019 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #7 | Climate Change says:
    February 16, 2019 at 12:44 pm

    […] Kids Climate Case Plaintiffs Ask Court to Halt New Federal Fossil Fuel Leases by Marco Poggio, Climate Liability News, Feb 8, 2019 […]

  5. 2019 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #7 – Menopausal Mother Nature says:
    February 17, 2019 at 1:22 am

    […] Kids Climate Case Plaintiffs Ask Court to Halt New Federal Fossil Fuel Leases by Marco Poggio, Climate Liability News, Feb 8, 2019 […]

  6. Youth climate movement gains steam, rallies behind landmark U.S. case says:
    February 20, 2019 at 2:49 pm

    […] Kids Climate Case Plaintiffs Ask Court to Halt New Federal Fossil Fuel… […]

  7. Climate change lawsuits: why kids, cities, farmers, and fishermen are suing | Micro ABC XYZ says:
    February 22, 2019 at 9:34 am

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile case, Juliana v. United States, against the government. (The case is […]

  8. Pay attention to the growing wave of climate change lawsuits – The Real News Nowadays says:
    February 22, 2019 at 9:35 am

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile case, Juliana v. United States, against the government. (The case is […]

  9. Pay attention to the growing wave of climate change lawsuits – Latest Online News Website says:
    February 22, 2019 at 9:35 am

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile case, Juliana v. United States, against the government. (The case is […]

  10. Blog: Pay attention to the growing wave of climate change lawsuits – Nur die Kirschen says:
    February 22, 2019 at 9:38 am

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile case, Juliana v. United States, against the government. (The case is […]

  11. Climate change lawsuits: why kids, cities, farmers, and fishermen are suing – Vox – Grandchildren’s Fund for a Fossil Fuel Free Future says:
    February 22, 2019 at 12:38 pm

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile climate rights case, Juliana v. United States, against the […]

  12. Climate change lawsuits: why kids, cities, farmers, and fishermen are suing | says:
    February 22, 2019 at 1:20 pm

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile climate rights case, Juliana v. United States, against the […]

  13. The growing wave of climate change lawsuits | willemtanja says:
    February 23, 2019 at 5:46 am

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile climate rights case, Juliana v. United States, against the […]

  14. Pay attention to the growing wave of climate change lawsuits - Attention to the Unseen says:
    February 25, 2019 at 9:11 pm

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile climate rights case, Juliana v. United States, against the […]

  15. Global warming, fossil fuels focus of new wave of lawsuits says:
    March 1, 2019 at 9:26 am

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile climate rights case, Juliana v. United States, against the […]

  16. Global warming, fossil fuels focus of new wave of lawsuits – National Courts Monitor says:
    March 1, 2019 at 9:35 am

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile climate rights case, Juliana v. United States, against the government. […]

  17. Climate change lawsuits: why kids, cities, farmers, and fishermen are suing - The Latest World News says:
    March 26, 2019 at 2:59 pm

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile climate rights case, Juliana v. United States, against the […]

  18. Pay attention to the growing wave of climate change lawsuits - NewsCatch says:
    March 26, 2019 at 3:15 pm

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile climate rights case, Juliana v. United States, against the […]

  19. Local weather change lawsuits: why youngsters, cities, farmers, and fishermen are suing | InfoFisher says:
    March 26, 2019 at 4:46 pm

    […] the general public about their harms. In parallel, 21 younger individuals are attempting to suspend fossil fuel development as a part of their high-profile local weather rights case, Juliana v. United States, in opposition […]

  20. Pay attention to the growing wave of climate change lawsuits | vincent idele's blog says:
    March 26, 2019 at 8:07 pm

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile climate rights case, Juliana v. United States, against the […]

  21. Pay attention to the growing wave of climate change lawsuits – AVConnecting says:
    April 10, 2019 at 11:07 am

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile climate rights case, Juliana v. United States, against the […]

  22. Pay attention to the growing wave of climate change lawsuits | says:
    April 10, 2019 at 4:24 pm

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile climate rights case, Juliana v. United States, against the […]

  23. Pay attention to the growing wave of climate change lawsuits – Valerian's Realm says:
    April 14, 2019 at 5:16 pm

    […] warming while misleading the public about their harms. In parallel, 21 young people are trying to suspend fossil fuel development as part of their high-profile climate rights case, Juliana v. United States, against the […]

  24. From Climate Change To Juul And Beyond, 2019’s Landmark Legal Moments says:
    January 9, 2020 at 6:32 pm

    […] this year, 21 young people filed a motion with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to temporarily freeze new fossil fuel infrastructure permits. Their goal was to keep the industry tied up until their court case, Juliana v. United States makes […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Climate Case Gets Green Light from European Union Court
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads
  • Exxon Backs a Modest Carbon Tax, But Knows Only a Strong One Will Slow Climate Change
  • After Opioids, Will Climate Change Be the Next Successful Liability Battle?
  • Study Estimates Seawalls to Protect U.S. Coast Will Cost $400 Billion

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.