The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / California Climate Lawsuits / Climate Liability Suits by San Francisco and Oakland Receive Flood of Support
Climate Liability Suits by San Francisco and Oakland Receive Flood of Support

Climate Liability Suits by San Francisco and Oakland Receive Flood of Support

March 27, 2019 Filed Under: California Climate Lawsuits

print

By Dana Drugmand

Support piled in last week for the liability suits filed by San Francisco and Oakland against five oil companies, including friend-of-the-court briefs from six Democratic senators, several government associations as well as former Secretary of State John Kerry and former Environmental Protection Agency head Gina McCarthy.

Their arguments—that courts are the proper forum to hold Big Oil accountable for its role in climate change because those corporations have held political sway over the legislative and executive branches of government—also got a lift last week with new research showing how much the industry has spent lobbying government officials over the past three years.

According to the report by the United Kingdom-based research group Influence Map, the top five largest oil and gas companies (BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Shell, and Total) spent more than $1 billion on misleading climate messaging and lobbying since 2015.

The brief filed by six Democratic senators last week to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals backing San Francisco and Oakland’s suits highlighted just that, detailing the oil companies’ “multi-million dollar campaign of deception and obstruction against progress on climate change.” The brief outlines multiple examples of fossil fuel industry lobbying against proposed legislation and regulations addressing carbon emissions, as well as funding politicians who oppose climate action.

The briefs were filed in support of the cities’ appeal to the Ninth Circuit, trying to reverse the cases’ dismissal by U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup last year. Alsup said the courts should not decide issues involving climate change because the issue is better suited for the other branches of government.

“As United States Senators with decades of collective experience in Congress, we have watched from the front row the efforts of these Defendants, directly, through trade associations, and through other groups they fund, to block climate action in the other coequal branches,” wrote Sens. Diane Feinstein and Kamala Harris of Calif., Richard Blumenthal of Conn., Mazie Hirono of Hawaii, Ed Markey of Mass., and Sheldon Whitehouse of R.I. Other supporting briefs came from former federal government officials and diplomats including Kerry and McCarthy; 11 state attorneys general; the California State Association of Counties; the National League of Cities, the U.S. Conference of Mayors, and the International Municipal Lawyers Association; a group of scholars studying climate deception, including Geoffrey Supran and Naomi Oreskes of Harvard; foreign relations and conflict of laws scholars; more than a dozen law professors; climate scientists; and the Natural Resources Defense Council.

As the senators wrote in their brief, large trade associations that major oil companies support or maintain membership in have actively lobbied against environmental and climate policies. Over the last two decades, the American Petroleum Institute has spent more than $112 million in federal lobbying, the National Association of Manufacturers spent more than $163 million and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has spent more than $1.5 billion. The Chamber of Commerce and NAM both filed amicus briefs backing fossil fuel companies in other climate liability lawsuits currently under appeal.

While industry trade associations continue to lobby on behalf of fossil fuel corporations, the corporations themselves are spending millions on public messaging and political influence.   Influence Map’s research found the five largest oil companies invested $195 million annually on public relations and “branding” campaigns touting low-carbon technologies and support for the Paris Climate Agreement. At the same time, these companies spent another $200 million annually on lobbying against climate policy and regulations, directly and through trade associations. As the report notes, “This lobbying has hindered governments globally in their efforts to implement such policies post-Paris.”

Chevron refuted the report’s characterizations.

“We were not been afforded the opportunity to review the data but we disagree with the assertion that Chevron has engaged in ‘climate-related branding and lobbying’ that is ‘overwhelmingly in conflict’ with the Paris Agreement,” a Chevron spokesperson said in a statement. “We lobby ethically, constructively, and in a nonpartisan manner. We lobby in accordance with all laws.”

The spokesman said Chevron has invested $1.1 billion in carbon capture and storage projects in Australia and Canada, and spent $8.5 billion since 2000 on research and development on energy alternatives. “We are taking action to address potential climate change risks to our business and investing in technology and low carbon business opportunities that could reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” he said.

But this investment pales in comparison with capital spending on the core oil and gas business, the Influence Map report said. “Company disclosures show low carbon investments will comprise only about 3 percent of the oil majors’ expected investments, with the rest of their combined annual capital expenditure ($115Bn for 2019) focused on fossil fuel related businesses,” the report said.

The report also said the oil companies are increasingly leaving the lobbying efforts to their trade associations.

“Just last month, trade association American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), which counts BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell among its largest members, reiterated its opposition to carbon pricing despite the fact that BP, ExxonMobil, and Shell all publicly claim to support carbon pricing,” the senators’ brief said.

The report notes the mounting pressures facing the fossil fuel industry from media scrutiny, to pressure from shareholders and emerging liability lawsuits. “While none of these suits has caused the oil majors any financial stress thus far, this may change should a precedence be set in a future court ruling,” the report said.

The senators concluded their brief with the notion that the oil majors should be held liable for the impacts of climate change.

“Having spent three decades directly obstructing climate action in Congress, at executive agencies, and in international fora, while simultaneously funding myriad trade associations and front groups to lead the obstruction charge, Defendants do not have clean hands,” they said.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: California Climate Lawsuits

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. San Franscisco, Oakland receive wide support in climate suit – Climate Liability News says:
    March 28, 2019 at 9:40 am

    […] San Franscisco, Oakland receive wide support in climate suit Climate Liability News […]

  2. Hawaii leaders mull potential of climate liability cases says:
    May 17, 2019 at 9:53 am

    […] at the climate conference, explaining why she co-drafted a friend-of-the-court brief in support of climate liability lawsuits filed by the cities of Oakland and San […]

  3. Oil industry supporters argue cities cannot sue for climate liability says:
    May 23, 2019 at 10:53 am

    […] recently appealed Alsup’s ruling and submitted their brief in March, which was followed with a wide range of supporting briefs including from six U.S. senators, former federal diplomats and nine states plus the District of […]

  4. Kamala Harris: Oil industry should be held accountable for climate crisis says:
    September 5, 2019 at 12:39 pm

    […] on that promise as she ran for her Senate seat. As a senator, she has co-signed an amicus brief in support of Oakland and San Francisco suing fossil fuel companies to pay for climate […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Climate Case Gets Green Light from European Union Court
  • What Oil Companies Knew About Climate Change and When: A Timeline
  • Court: Climate Impacts of Pipeline Projects Cannot Be Ignored
  • Richmond Battles Chevron, Its Biggest Employer, in Two Important Lawsuits
  • France, Home of the Paris Agreement, Faces Lawsuit for Lack of Climate Progress

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.