The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Shell Sued in the Netherlands for Insufficient Action On Climate Change
Shell Sued in the Netherlands for Insufficient Action On Climate Change

Shell Sued in the Netherlands for Insufficient Action On Climate Change

April 5, 2019 Filed Under: International, Liability Litigation

print

By Karen Savage

Seven environmental and human rights organizations in the Netherlands have filed suit against Royal Dutch Shell for failing to align its business model with the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement.

The suit, which is the first to directly challenge an oil company’s business model, was filed Friday in The Hague by Friends of the Earth Netherlands/ Milieudefensie, Greenpeace Netherlands, five other organizations and more than 17,000 Dutch citizens.

The plaintiffs are not seeking financial compensation, but are asking Shell to adjust its business model in order to keep global temperature rise below 1.5 degrees Celsius, as recommended by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). They allege that by following a business model that it knows will not reach these goals, Shell is violating a Dutch law prohibiting “unlawful endangerment” and is violating human rights by taking insufficient action against climate change.

“If successful, the uniqueness of the case would be that Shell – as one of the largest multinational corporations in the world – would be legally obligated to change its business operations,” said Milieudefensie attorney Roger Cox, who also represented plaintiffs in the landmark Urgenda suit.

Urgenda was the first case in which a court ordered a government to reduce its emissions and the first time a court ruled that not taking sufficient action on climate change is a human rights violation.

Plaintiffs allege Shell’s current business model threatens human rights because the oil giant is knowingly undermining the world’s chances to keep warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius. They maintain that rather than guarantee emission reductions, Shell’s current plan would contribute to a much larger global temperature increase.

Shell did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but in a Dec. 2018 press release said it “aims to reduce the net carbon footprint of its energy products by around half by 2050, and by around 20% by 2035, in step with society’s drive to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement.”

Plaintiffs maintain that a reduction of the company’s carbon footprint is not the same as a reduction in total greenhouse gas emissions because the carbon footprint involves a relative reduction in carbon emissions per unit of energy produced for the market, not an absolute reduction. Shell could reach its goals by producing as many units of renewable energy as it does oil and gas and could therefore reduce its carbon intensity by half without ever having to reduce its production or trade of fossil fuels.

By using this formula, plaintiffs contend that Shell – which has announced plans to link executive pay to the targets – could reach its stated goals without reducing its carbon emissions.

They say even if Shell’s goals were specific to emission reductions, the company’s target of a 50 percent reduction by 2050 still falls short of the IPCC recommendation that carbon emissions reach net zero by mid-century.

If successful, the lawsuit will be the first in which a company is ordered to reduce emissions.

The suit should come as no surprise to Shell. As required by the Dutch legal system, the defendant organizations sent the company a liability letter last year, demanding it cut back on its oil and gas production and align its business strategy with the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement. Shell rejected those demands, saying it “strongly supports” the goals of the Paris Agreement and pointing to the company’s Sky scenario, as “a technically possible but challenging pathway” toward achieving those goals. The groups, which encouraged Dutch citizens to sign on to the suit, announced in February they intended to sue the oil giant.

According to the Carbon Majors report, which was compiled and released in 2017 by the Climate Accountability Institute, Shell ranked sixth in the world in cumulative greenhouse gas emissions between 1854 and 2010.

Shell has known about the risks of climate change for decades, according to documents unearthed last year by Jelmer Mommers, a climate and energy journalist for the Dutch news organization De Correspondent.  

In one document, an internal, confidential 1988 report dubbed The Greenhouse Effect, Shell acknowledged that potential climate change risks “could have major business implications for the fossil fuel industry”. Documents also show Shell advocated against action on climate, emphasized scientific uncertainty, worked to downplay the efforts of the IPCC and even predicted that the company – along with the rest of the fossil fuel industry – could be one day be held liable for not acting to prevent further damage to the climate.

Plaintiffs maintain it is still possible to limit global warming to less than 1.5 degrees Celsius, but doing so will require immediate large-scale changes, including a transition to renewable energy and drastic emission reductions by Shell and other carbon polluters.

“We also expect that this [case] would have an effect on other fossil fuel companies, raising the pressure on them to change,” Cox said.

Sara Shaw, an international climate justice and energy campaigner with Friends of the Earth Netherlands, said some of Shell’s predictions are right on point.

“In leaked company documents from the 1990’s, Shell predicted that environmental organizations would start suing the company for causing climate change if it did not listen to the warnings of its own scientists – well, that day has come,” said Shaw.

“This rising tide of climate litigation will finally call climate-wrecking corporations like Shell to account and stop them in their tracks.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: International, Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Activists Demand Shell Commit Harikari | Science Matters says:
    April 5, 2019 at 2:44 pm

    […] Liability News has the story Shell Sued in the Netherlands for Insufficient Action On Climate Change.  Excerpts in italics with my […]

  2. Shell sued in Netherlands for insufficient action on climate change – Climate Liability News | Environment.org says:
    April 6, 2019 at 1:01 am

    […] Shell sued in Netherlands for insufficient action on climate change  Climate Liability News […]

  3. Shell Sued in the Netherlands for Insufficient Action On Climate Change – Olduvai.ca says:
    April 9, 2019 at 9:00 am

    […] Shell Sued in the Netherlands for Insufficient Action On Climate Change […]

  4. Trump order takes aim at shareholder climate resolutions says:
    April 17, 2019 at 11:28 am

    […] Shell Sued in the Netherlands for Insufficient Action On Climate Change […]

  5. BP passes one climate resolution, escapes a more ambitious one says:
    May 21, 2019 at 10:33 pm

    […] environmental and human rights organizations in the Netherlands filed suit against the company in April, contending that a reduction of the company’s carbon footprint […]

  6. OilWire #12: Waorani win in Ecuador; Shell, BP evade real emissions cuts; Gas permits denied by 2 U.S. states – Global Gas & Oil Network says:
    June 12, 2019 at 5:30 pm

    […] reality. Seven civil society groups and over 17,000 citizen co-plaintiffs in the Netherlands are suing Shell to force the company to actually align with the Paris goals. The day before BP’s meeting, […]

  7. Local authorities, activist groups sue French oil giant Total to cut emissions says:
    January 30, 2020 at 1:51 pm

    […] lawsuit in the Netherlands. Environmental groups, backed by more than 17,000 Dutch citizens, sued the oil giant last year demanding it adjust its business model to align with the 1.5 degree C temperature target. […]

  8. Shell’s Latest Annual Report: More Greenwashing? – Enjeux énergies et environnement says:
    March 20, 2020 at 6:22 am

    […] own business is therefore not aligned with the goal of the Paris Agreement, and the company is facing a lawsuit over this in its home country of the Netherlands. Current emissions reduction plans or […]

  9. How to Stop Touching Your Face to Minimize Spread of Coronavirus and Other Germs – Enjeux énergies et environnement says:
    March 21, 2020 at 10:30 am

    […] not aligned with the goal of the Paris agreement, and the company is <a href= »https://www.climatedocket.com/2019/04/05/shell-sued-in-the-netherlands-for-insufficient-actio&#8230;; target= »_blank »>facing a lawsuit</a> over this in its home […]

  10. For My Birthday, All I Want Is a Healthy Forest – Enjeux énergies et environnement says:
    March 21, 2020 at 12:59 pm

    […] not aligned with the goal of the Paris agreement, and the company is <a href= »https://www.climatedocket.com/2019/04/05/shell-sued-in-the-netherlands-for-insufficient-actio&#8230;; target= »_blank »>facing a lawsuit</a> over this in its home […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads
  • Judge Agrees to Divest from Exxon Before New York's Climate Fraud Case
  • Youth Climate Case in Washington State Dismissed by King County Judge
  • Battling for Big Oil: Manufacturing Trade Group Leads Assault on Climate Suits
  • What Oil Companies Knew About Climate Change and When: A Timeline

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.