The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Featured / New Colorado Law Requires State to Consider Health Impacts of Oil Drilling
New Colorado Law Requires State to Consider Health Impacts of Oil Drilling

New Colorado Law Requires State to Consider Health Impacts of Oil Drilling

April 17, 2019 Filed Under: Featured

print

By Dana Drugmand

Colorado has passed a law requiring state regulators to prioritize public health and the environment in regulating oil and gas operations, drawing sharp criticism from the fossil fuel industry and praise from a group of young people who had unsuccessfully sued the state trying to force those regulations.

Gov. Jared Polis signed the law on Tuesday, requiring the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) to prioritize protecting public health, the climate and environment in issuing permits for oil and gas operations. The youth-led lawsuit Martinez v. COGCC had sought exactly that, but the Colorado Supreme Court rejected that argument in dismissing the case in January.

Since then, Polis, a Democrat who ran on a pro-climate platform, took office and the legislation was quickly passed.

As stated in the bill, Section 11 “requires the commission to protect and minimize adverse impacts to public health, safety, and welfare, the environment, and wildlife resources and protect against adverse environmental impacts on any air, water, soil, or biological resource resulting from oil and gas operations.” The law also establishes local governments’ authority to regulate siting of oil and gas development to minimize adverse impacts.

The youth lawsuit, which was supported by the legal advocacy nonprofit Our Children’s Trust, was unsuccessful because the Supreme Court said previous regulations were unclear about how to balance public health concerns with the development of resource. The new law addresses this perceived ambiguity, acknowledging that the “[Oil and Gas Conservation] Act has been construed to impose a balancing test between fostering oil and gas development and protecting the public health, safety, and welfare.” But the new law clarifies that instead of a balancing test, the commission must protect public health, welfare and the environment.

“Coloradans, and the Colorado General Assembly, have made clear that they have had enough of unchecked oil and gas development that is contaminating the air they breathe, the water they drink, endangering their homes and lives, and causing climate change,” Julia Olson, executive director of Our Children’s Trust, said in a statement. “There is more work ahead to ensure that the Commission complies with this clear statutory mandate but there is no question that this bill is a big win for the youth plaintiffs and all Coloradans.”

The oil and gas industry criticized the bill, which it said “fundamentally alters the natural gas and oil industry’s future in the State of Colorado.” A Colorado Petroleum Council spokesman called the bill “deeply flawed” and said it “remains a threat to one of the foundations of Colorado’s economy.”

The new law makes other adjustments to the existing oil and gas statute. It directs the air quality commission to adopt rules to minimize emissions of methane, volatile organic compounds and nitrous oxides. It repeals an exemption for the industry from counties’ authority to regulate noise, and repeals the requirement that the COGCC take into consideration cost-effectiveness and technical feasibility. It also alters the composition of the COGCC, reducing the industry representation to one member and requiring other members to have expertise in wildlife and environmental protection, soil conservation, and public health.

“​I have been fighting for the protection of public health, safety, welfare, and land of Coloradans for seven years. This clear law, that so many of us worked so hard for, is an important start,” said Emma Bray, 19-year-old plaintiff in Martinez v. COGCC. “Now we need to hold the Commission accountable if we want to protect the environment and the futures of young people like me.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Featured

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Colorado begins to tackle health, climate impacts of oil drilling says:
    August 1, 2019 at 9:59 am

    […] controls are consistent with Senate Bill 181, which was signed into law in April and requires the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases
  • Climate Suits Grew in 2020, Could Clear Huge Hurdle in 2021

Most Popular

  • Hawaii Joins Trend: Recognizes Constitutional Right to Safe Climate and Environment
  • R.I. Wins Battle to Keep Climate Suit Vs. Big Oil in State Court
  • As San Francisco, Oakland Press Climate Cases, They Pay Homage to Tiny Kivalina
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.