The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / New York Moves to Tackle Emissions as it Wrestles with Climate Costs
New York Moves to Tackle Emissions as it Wrestles with Climate Costs

New York Moves to Tackle Emissions as it Wrestles with Climate Costs

April 18, 2019 Filed Under: Liability Litigation, New York City Lawsuit

print

By Dana Drugmand

New York City, which is attempting to force fossil fuel companies to pay for climate change adaptation costs through a lawsuit, has passed groundbreaking legislation addressing its own greenhouse gas emissions. The New York City Council voted 45-2 on Thursday in favor of a suite of bills aimed at cutting carbon emissions, improving energy efficiency and advancing clean energy.

“Our planet is closing in on a breaking point, and we have to transition from investing in fossil fuel infrastructure to clean renewable energy,” City Council Speaker Cory Johnson said in a press conference. He said the legislation, called the Climate Mobilization Act, is the city’s version of the Green New Deal.

The package of bills focuses on the city’s buildings, which account for more than two-thirds of the city’s greenhouse gas emissions. The centerpiece bill, Intro 1253, requires certain large buildings over 25,000 square feet in size to reduce emissions 40 percent by 2030 and 80 percent by 2050. Landmark buildings like the Empire State Building and luxury buildings such as Trump Tower are included in the requirement, while others, including churches and apartment buildings with rent-regulated and affordable housing units, are exempt. The large buildings targeted by the bill make up only 2 percent of the city’s buildings but contribute 30 percent of emissions.

“Intro 1253 is the single biggest thing New York City can do to address climate change,” said Bill Lipton, director of the New York Working Families Party. “It will make us a national leader in climate policy while creating tens of thousands of good jobs.”

The bill creates a new Office of Building Energy Performance to oversee and implement the emissions cuts and includes penalties and enforcement mechanisms to ensure building owners meet the standards. It is believed to be the first municipal mandate that sets limits on emissions from existing buildings in alignment with the Paris Agreement goals.

“The Climate Mobilization Act is a down payment on the future of New York City — one that ensures we lead the way in the ever-growing fight against climate change,” added Council Member Costa Constantinides, Chair of the Committee on Environmental Protection. “Today, we sent that message to the world by enacting the boldest mandate to reduce carbon emissions, tackling one of the biggest drivers of climate change.”

In dismissing New York’s climate liability suit against five oil companies last year, a federal judge used the argument that the city bears some of the responsibility for climate change because it uses and benefits from fossil fuels. The city has appealed the dismissal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing it is seeking not to regulate the emissions from fossil fuels but recoup damages caused by a product the companies knew to present danger to the climate.

At the time, the city estimated its climate adaptation costs at $20 billion, but also acknowledged that number will likely rise. That number does not include the recently announced plan to “flood-proof” lower Manhattan by extending the shoreline into the East River, which is estimated to cost $10 billion.

While the city wrestles with those costs and who pays for them, it has also moved ahead to tackle the problem of its own emissions.

Other bills passed Tuesday require some new buildings to have  “green roofs” covered in vegetation, solar panels or small wind turbines; another instructs the city to study the feasibility of  shutting down 21 gas-fired power plants and replacing them with renewable generation; and one that obligates the building department to include wind turbines in its consideration of renewable energy technologies and to authorize large wind turbine installation in appropriate locations.

“To say the least, we would like our national government to focus more on how to stop global warming, but in the meantime, the City of New York is doing all we can,” Mayor Bill de Blasio said.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Liability Litigation, New York City Lawsuit

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Removing the upfront cost of retrofits says:
    May 22, 2019 at 11:25 am

    […] York City’s new law limiting carbon emissions in large buildings and an innovative passive house retrofit in Hamilton both highlight the crucial […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Climate Case Gets Green Light from European Union Court
  • Exxon Continues to Fund 'Science' Group Steeped in Climate Denial and Delay
  • Pacific Islands Group Pushes for International Court Ruling on Climate and Human Rights
  • Study Estimates Seawalls to Protect U.S. Coast Will Cost $400 Billion
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.