The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / International / Complaint Charges Australia with Human Rights Violations over Climate Change
Complaint Charges Australia with Human Rights Violations over Climate Change

Complaint Charges Australia with Human Rights Violations over Climate Change

May 12, 2019 Filed Under: International

print

By Dana Drugmand

A group of indigenous Australians have brought a legal complaint against the Australian government for violating their human rights by contributing to climate change.

The complaint, filed by indigenous people from the Torres Strait Islands to the United Nations Human Rights Committee, alleges the government’s inadequate response to the climate crisis is a violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the world’s oldest human rights treaty. It is the first climate change case in Australia based on human rights claims and it is believed to be the first in the world brought by residents of low-lying islands against a national government.

The Torres Strait Islands are located between the northern tip of Queensland, Australia and the southern edge of Papua New Guinea. Climate change threatens the islands, which experience regular flooding because of sea level rise, and the islanders’ sacred cultural sites.

Fearing that their home and way of life could disappear, the Torres Strait Islanders are seeking legal recourse. Eight islanders from four different islands submitted their complaint on Monday. The Human Rights Committee monitors nations’ compliance with the ICCPR. The islanders’ complaint alleges that Australia violated their rights under the treaty, including the right to life and culture and the right to be free from arbitrary interference with privacy, family and home.

“Climate change is fundamentally a human rights issue. The predicted impacts of climate change in the Torres Strait, including the inundation of ancestral homelands, would be catastrophic for its people,” said Sophie Marjanac, attorney with the nonprofit environmental law firm ClientEarth, which is representing the islanders.

A decision by the Human Rights Committee would not be legally binding, but could exert significant moral pressure on the Australian government to comply.

The Torres Strait region’s land and sea council, known as GBK, is supporting the claim and has launched a national petition calling on the Australian government to increase climate adaptation and mitigation. It calls on the government to commit $20 million to emergency resiliency projects like sea walls, invest long-term in adaptation measures, reduce emissions by at least 65 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. It calls for  achieving net zero emissions before 2050 and phasing out coal for domestic electricity and export.

The Australian government has adopted an emissions reduction target of 26-28 percent by 2030 but lacks a concrete plan to meet the target. The government has continued to promote fossil fuel projects, particularly coal and coal seam gas. Last month, the government green-lighted groundwater management plans for the controversial Adani coal mine. A court in New South Wales ruled against another proposed coal mine due to its impact on climate change in February.

The Torres Strait Islanders’ case is part of a growing global climate justice movement seeking to hold governments and fossil fuel companies accountable. The first successful climate lawsuit came when Dutch citizens won a ruling in 2015 compelling the government of the Netherlands live up to its promised emissions reductions. That case inspired others, including the landmark youth-led case Juliana v. United States. The Philippines Commission on Human Rights is also investigating the role of 47 fossil fuel corporations in causing climate change and potentially violating human rights. Another Pacific island nation, Vanuatu, has indicated interest in pursuing climate liability litigation against fossil fuel companies and the governments that support them.

According to ClientEarth, the Torres Strait Islanders’ claim could take up to three years to resolve. If successful, it would be the first decision from an international body finding that nation states have a duty to reduce their emissions under human rights law.

“The Torres Strait Islands have been settled for millennia, but if the Australian government continues on its present course they may not last the century,” said Bill McKibben, co-founder of the climate justice organization 350.org, which is also supporting the action. “This lawsuit is part of an epic fight to hold the carbon barons accountable for wrecking the one planet we’ve got.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: International

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Human Rights Approach to Climate Change Emerging Grievances and Existing Framework – WSDF says:
    June 17, 2019 at 5:10 am

    […] UN against Australian government’s inaction on climate change, which as per them violates their fundamental human rights, by stripping their community of culture, traditions, social and emotional well-being. The case […]

  2. Pacific islands group seeks international court ruling on climate, human rights says:
    August 13, 2019 at 3:45 pm

    […] as well as in the U.S. In May, a group of indigenous Australians from the Torres Strait Islands brought a complaint against Australia before the UN Human Rights Committee over climate change and human rights. And the Philippines’ […]

  3. Human Rights Approach to Climate Change: Emerging Grievances and Existing Framework | World Sustainable Development Forum says:
    August 19, 2019 at 3:40 am

    […] UN against Australian government’s inaction on climate change, which as per them violates their fundamental human rights, by stripping their community of culture, traditions, social and emotional well-being. The case […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Climate Case Gets Green Light from European Union Court
  • Exxon Continues to Fund 'Science' Group Steeped in Climate Denial and Delay
  • Pacific Islands Group Pushes for International Court Ruling on Climate and Human Rights
  • Study Estimates Seawalls to Protect U.S. Coast Will Cost $400 Billion
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.