The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Canadian Judge Halts Youth Climate Lawsuit
Canadian Judge Halts Youth Climate Lawsuit

Canadian Judge Halts Youth Climate Lawsuit

July 15, 2019 Filed Under: International, Liability Litigation

print

By Dana Drugmand

A Canadian judge halted a climate lawsuit filed by a group of young people in Quebec against the Canadian government, rejecting its class action status in a ruling last week.

The lawsuit was brought by the organization ENvironnement JEUnesse (ENJEU) on behalf of people age 35 and under in Quebec. The group said it plans to appeal the narrow procedural ruling, in which the judge questioned the age definition of the class of young Canadians. 

In his ruling, Justice Gary Morrison of the Superior Court of Quebec wrote, “the choice of age 35 by [ENvironnement JEUnesse] to the maximum age of members, leaves the Tribunal perplexed…But why choose 35 years? Why not 20, 30 or 40? Why not 60?” 

Advocates representing the young plaintiffs said they did not expect the judge to take issue with the case’s age limit, chosen to emphasize that the climate crisis will disproportionately impact young people.   

“I was really surprised with the judge asking what about people 60 years old,” said Catherine Gauthier, executive director of ENJEU.

“It goes without saying that a 60-year-old could not qualify as a young person,” added Bruce Johnston, a lawyer and partner at Trudel Johnston & Lespérance, which is representing ENJEU pro bono. 

Morrison also questioned the “35 and under” classification with no defined minimum age. Class members, he said, should be at least 18 years old. 

ENJEU officials said they relied on the expertise of the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, which declares, “Due to their particular metabolism, physiology and development needs, children are disproportionately affected by changes in their environment. Young children […] are more adversely affected by climate change.” 

Aside from the age issue, Morrison did accept ENJEU’s core claims against the government as justiciable.

“The important issues have been decided in our favor: the judge recognizes that the impact of climate change on human rights is a justiciable issue and that the actions of the government in this area are subject to the Canadian Charters and Quebec rights and freedoms,” Johnston said. 

The next step, according to Gauthier, is to appeal Morrison’s ruling. “We need to make sure we have a clear definition of the members of our class action,” she said. “We will continue to fight for actions that live up to the climate crisis.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: International, Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads
  • Judge Agrees to Divest from Exxon Before New York's Climate Fraud Case
  • Youth Climate Case in Washington State Dismissed by King County Judge
  • Battling for Big Oil: Manufacturing Trade Group Leads Assault on Climate Suits
  • What Oil Companies Knew About Climate Change and When: A Timeline

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.