The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Could Insurance Lawsuits Against Big Oil Be the Next Wave in Climate Liability?
Could Insurance Lawsuits Against Big Oil Be the Next Wave in Climate Liability?

Could Insurance Lawsuits Against Big Oil Be the Next Wave in Climate Liability?

July 18, 2019 Filed Under: Liability Litigation

print

By Kaitlin Sullivan

Lawsuits filed by insurance companies against the fossil fuel industry seeking to recoup payouts to policyholders for climate damages could become the second wave of climate change litigation.

That possibility exists if the first wave of climate lawsuits—communities suing the industry under public nuisance and other laws to hold them liable for the impacts of climate change—starts to be successful, legal experts say. 

The next kind of lawsuit could come from insurance companies attempting to recover part of what was paid to policyholders for damage caused by climate disasters. These are called subrogation claims, and are commonly used in the U.S. by insurers who try to prove those losses were caused by a third party, which should be held liable for those damages.

“Subrogation claims are unlikely until liability is established in other litigation. Once a precedent is set in these cases, it will be a blueprint for what happens with subrogation,” said Jason Reeves, an attorney at Zelle International in London who specializes in disputes involving energy, property and power. “But there are still a lot of hoops to go through.” 

Last year, insurers paid out $90 billion worldwide to policyholders impacted by natural disasters. Sixty-four percent of those losses were incurred in the U.S., where subrogation is an established part of insurance law. As massive wildfires and rising sea levels increasingly cause damage to property, insurers may consider pursuing subrogation against those found responsible for climate change. Increasingly, researchers have been able to identify the proportion of global warming caused by the major fossil fuel producers, called the Carbon Majors.

“Once a court finds a carbon major liable for causing climate change-related damage to the property of a private plaintiff or government entity, we expect that the litigation flood gates will open, and many other parties will bring damages lawsuits against greenhouse gas polluters, relying on the same type of evidence and arguments that the court found satisfactory,” Reeves wrote in a recent article. 

There is already some precedent for subrogation claims involving climate, said Stephanie Morton, an insurance lawyer with Client Earth, a non-profit legal organization based in London.

“The link with climate change presents new opportunities for subrogation and the cases currently in the courts are very relevant for insurers. Subrogated claims in connection with climate risk are not without precedent. We have seen insurers explore this before and we may see them do so again,” Morton said.

Morton said that precedent was set in 2014 when Farmers Insurance Group filed nine class-action lawsuits Cook County, Illinois–– which includes Chicago –– on behalf of 600 property owners who were paid insurance claims for flood damages in 2013. At the time, it was considered an extreme example of subrogation. The lawsuit alleged that public agencies failed to take measures to prevent at least some of the damage caused by the floods. Farmers  dropped the suit just two months after filing it and according to a company spokesperson at the time, the purpose of the suit was to serve as a warning that municipalities must do more to reduce risks of flooding. 

“Climate subrogation in the short term is a real thing and quite active,” said Donald Hornstein, professor of law at the University of North Carolina.

The decision may not even rest in the hands of the insurance companies, who commonly sell their subrogation rights at a discount to third parties such as hedge funds. Those parties can then choose to bring claims at a later date, Hornstein told Climate Liability News. For example, many insurance companies paying claims after recent California wildfires no longer own those subrogation rights.

“Many of the insurance companies sold their subrogation rights at a discount to a hedge fund in Boston. Now it owns them and can bring them when it wants,” said Hornstein.

That hedge fund could sue PG&E, the large California utility that has already been deemed liable for some of the major fires its equipment sparked. PG&E filed for bankruptcy earlier this year, faced with an estimated $30 billion in wildfire liabilities. Or, it could consider targeting the fossil fuel industry itself.

Establishing Blame Presents Challenges

Both Hornstein and Reeves say that even if one of the current cases successfully holds climate majors liable for climate change damages, a subrogation claim will still be difficult. 

“Climate change is hard to pin on just a few companies,” Reeves said. 

The companies that extracted hydrocarbons aren’t necessarily the ones that used them, which in subrogation, could potentially make anyone who has consumed fossil fuels liable for the damage climate change has caused. 

But, as science definitively ties global warming to the burning of fossil fuels, insurance companies could use the same arguments being used in the current lawsuits: that the industry has known for decades that its products drive global warming and not only still sold them, it actively worked to cloud public understanding of the issue and lobbied against climate action.

“Developments in science are making it easier to foresee the impacts of climate change,” Morton said. “Governments and companies need to adapt to those foreseeable risks and if they fail to do so, they open themselves up to legal exposure. Holding municipalities and companies accountable is becoming much more feasible.” 

Subrogation will not necessarily be contained to losses on behalf of policyholders. Liability insurers also have the ability to recoup losses associated with their clients being sued. In either circumstance, insurance companies have a huge stake in climate change litigation. 

“Climate change is expected to lead to more extreme weather and this has implications for insurance companies that are exposed to this. It’s important that insurance companies compliment premium adjustments with other techniques such as legal action to reduce risk and recover losses,” Morton said. 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Could insurance lawsuits vs. Big Oil be the next wave of climate liabiilty? - Climate Liability News | ArticleVillage.Net says:
    July 18, 2019 at 10:06 pm

    […] Source link […]

  2. Jay Inslee Says Fossil Fuel Execs Are ‘Killing People’ | CURRENT WORLD WIDE says:
    July 31, 2019 at 2:14 pm

    […] the attorneys general of New York, Massachusetts and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Now the industry is facing a new series of lawsuits from insurance […]

  3. Jay Inslee Says Fossil Fuel Execs Are 'Killing People' | A1TopNews says:
    July 31, 2019 at 2:46 pm

    […] the attorneys general of New York, Massachusetts and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Now the industry is facing a new series of lawsuits from insurance […]

  4. Jay Inslee Says Fossil Fuel Execs Are ‘Killing People’ – AccessPressMag.com, welcome you! says:
    July 31, 2019 at 3:23 pm

    […] the attorneys general of New York, Massachusetts and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Now the industry is facing a new series of lawsuits from insurance […]

  5. Jay Inslee Says Fossil Fuel Execs Are ‘Killing People’ - CrimeStopNews.Com says:
    July 31, 2019 at 5:17 pm

    […] the attorneys general of New York, Massachusetts and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Now the industry is facing a new series of lawsuits from insurance […]

  6. Jay Inslee Says Fossil Fuel Execs Are ‘Killing People’ – Trending News says:
    July 31, 2019 at 8:54 pm

    […] the attorneys general of New York, Massachusetts and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Now the industry is facing a new series of lawsuits from insurance […]

  7. Jay Inslee Says Fossil Fuel Execs Are 'Killing People' | US News Today says:
    July 31, 2019 at 9:10 pm

    […] attorneys general of New York, Massachusetts & the U.S. Virgin Islands. Now the industry is facing a new series of lawsuits from insurance […]

  8. Jay Inslee Says Fossil Fuel Execs Are ‘Killing People’ – AskTran.com says:
    August 12, 2019 at 6:41 am

    […] the attorneys general of New York, Massachusetts and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Now the industry is facing a new series of lawsuits from insurance […]

  9. Jay Inslee Says Fossil Fuel Execs Are ‘Killing People’ – LogHim, says:
    August 12, 2019 at 12:34 pm

    […] the attorneys general of New York, Massachusetts and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Now the industry is facing a new series of lawsuits from insurance […]

  10. The fossil fuel industries are under attack on four fronts – and they’re losing - Bellona.org says:
    April 30, 2020 at 5:14 pm

    […] to seek to recover part of what was paid to policyholders for damage caused by climate disasters. Hence their interest in suing the fossil fuel corporations. This type of lawsuit is called a subrogation claim, which is commonly used in the U.S. by insurers […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Climate Case Gets Green Light from European Union Court
  • What Oil Companies Knew About Climate Change and When: A Timeline
  • Court: Climate Impacts of Pipeline Projects Cannot Be Ignored
  • Richmond Battles Chevron, Its Biggest Employer, in Two Important Lawsuits
  • France, Home of the Paris Agreement, Faces Lawsuit for Lack of Climate Progress

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.