The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / International / London Climate Protesters Use Their Days in Court to Raise the Alarm
London Climate Protesters Use Their Days in Court to Raise the Alarm

London Climate Protesters Use Their Days in Court to Raise the Alarm

July 22, 2019 Filed Under: International

print

By Isabella Kaminski

LONDON—Hundreds of climate activists are appearing in court in the United Kingdom this summer, facing charges for taking part in the massive protests that snarled central London last April. And while the activists have been surprised by the city’s zeal in prosecuting them, they are also using it as another opportunity to air their grievances against the government.

“If I am guilty then so be it,” Samantha Jane Lindo said in tears after she pleaded guilty and was given a conditional discharge. “But I would like to say how much more guilty are the government… for not acting, not telling the truth and not doing their ultimate job by protecting us.”

The protests were organized by Extinction Rebellion, an activist group that has more protests planned to raise awareness of the urgency of the climate crisis in the UK, US and across the world. The group said it welcomed this “extraordinary opportunity” to take its message into the courts. “These prosecutions give our rebels a platform to speak the truth about the dire situation we’re in.” 

Lindo, a 34-year-old teacher and musician from Bristol, said she was sorry that she had taken police resources away from other important issues. “But the thing I’m most sorry about is that it has come to a point where I feel that getting myself arrested is one of the only things I feel I can do to get my voice heard. I have been legally marching and protesting my whole adult life. I have been ignored.”

The City of London Magistrates Court has set aside one day a week this summer to hear cases against people involved in the Extinction Rebellion protests.

The Metropolitan Police arrested 1,151 people over the two weeks of protests in April and originally charged around 70 with an offense. One person received a caution for “outraging public decency” and 32 people were released.

But the police’s stance hardened soon after. It set up a specialist team to refer as many cases as possible to the Crown Prosecution Service, and in June announced that nearly all of those arrested would be charged. 

So far, 180 people, ranging in age from 20 to some in their 70s, have been ordered to appear in court, mostly for breaching section 14 of the Public Order Act by ignoring conditions imposed by the police. 

Most of those who have appeared in court so far have pleaded not guilty; their trials are expected to take place throughout the fall.

One case that has already gone to trial is that of Angie Zelter, a 68-year-old woman who was found guilty of a public order offense in June. She was given a conditional discharge and ordered to pay about $800 in court costs. 

Zelter was defiant in court, saying she was fearful for the future and had not taken the decision to take part in Extinction Rebellion lightly.

Other defendants, aware they could be liable for legal fees and court costs, have pled guilty. 

Extinction Rebellion questioned the Metropolitan Police’s motives in prosecuting so many people, arguing that it was not in the public interest and there were more important problems to tackle in London, such as the recent surge in knife crime.

The police said the April protests had a “significant impact” on local policing, with thousands of officers diverted away from core local duties. Earlier this week, it asked the government for stronger powers and tougher sentences to deal with protestors.

The April protests were undoubtedly successful, with Extinction Rebellion’s three key demands largely being met: the UK has since declared a climate emergency, promised to set up a citizens’ assembly on climate change and in June became the first major economy in the world to pass a law pledging to be net zero by 2050 (although Extinction Rebellion had asked for a 2025 deadline).

And the protests have continued, with seven more people arrested this week at construction sites in London. They were charged with aggravated trespass. Other cases are currently being heard against protestors arrested in Bristol.

Extinction Rebellion’s legal team hopes to use the latest series of cases to set a legal precedent in England and Wales, establishing a “citizen’s right to act in the face of emergency.”

In May, two climate change protesters involved in setting up Extinction Rebellion were acquitted of criminal damage by a jury in a rare success using the necessity defense to justify civil disobedience. However, since public order offenses are considered more minor than criminal damage, defendants in the latest swathe of cases do not have a right to request a jury trial. 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: International

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases
  • Climate Suits Grew in 2020, Could Clear Huge Hurdle in 2021

Most Popular

  • Hawaii Joins Trend: Recognizes Constitutional Right to Safe Climate and Environment
  • R.I. Wins Battle to Keep Climate Suit Vs. Big Oil in State Court
  • As San Francisco, Oakland Press Climate Cases, They Pay Homage to Tiny Kivalina
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.