The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Shareholders Sue Exxon for Misrepresenting Climate Risks
Shareholders Sue Exxon for Misrepresenting Climate Risks

Shareholders Sue Exxon for Misrepresenting Climate Risks

August 7, 2019 Filed Under: Liability Litigation

print

By Karen Savage

A group of Exxon investors has filed suit in federal court against several of the company’s officials, directors and board members for failing to protect their investments as well as the company from the risks of climate change.

Saratoga Advantage Trust Energy and Basic Materials Portfolio, a mutual fund of Saratoga Advantage Trust, filed a derivative lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Trenton, N.J., on Tuesday against several current and former Exxon officials, including current chief executive officer and chairman of the board Darren Woods; former chief executive Rex Tillerson; principal financial officer and senior vice president Andrew Swiger; and several members of the company’s auditing committee.

A derivative suit is a lawsuit brought by shareholders against a corporation’s directors and management for failing to exercise their authority for the benefit of the company and all of its shareholders. This type of suit often arises when fraud, mismanagement or dishonesty is ignored by officers and the board of directors of a corporation and it allows the shareholders to sue on behalf of themselves and on behalf of the corporation. 

Saratoga alleges that the officials “knew, were reckless, or were grossly negligent in not knowing” that Exxon was misleading its investors regarding the risks of climate change to its business. It also alleges that the officials received “excessive compensation and benefits” while the company failed to accurately value its reserves, used two sets of numbers to calculate climate risk and filed misleading paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  Saratoga said the value of its investments dropped as a result. 

The defendants “did not adequately evaluate the potential impact of climate change-related risks on the value of Exxon’s assets and its long-term business prospects,” Saratoga alleged in the suit. 

The investors claim that some Exxon officials created a “culture of lawlessness within Exxon” and failed to prevent the oil giant from engaging in “unlawful acts,” while others “either knew, were reckless, or were grossly negligent in disregarding the illegal activity of such substantial magnitude and duration.”   

They say that the defendants knew that Exxon’s asset valuation processes were inaccurate and failed to did not accurately assess the risk climate change posed to the company.  They also allege the company misled investors and the public by failing to accurately account for the possibility that some of its assets would become stranded. 

They point to Exxon’s Managing the Risks report, which was issued in response to shareholder pressure. In the report, Exxon said it “takes the risk of climate change seriously and continues to take meaningful steps to help address the risk and to ensure our facilities, operations and investments are managed with this in mind.”

But when addressing how it is planning for the possibility of stranded assets, or whether or not its  present oil and gas reserves would be recoverable—also referred to as carbon asset risk—Exxon said climate change would not result in the stranding of its assets.

“We are confident that none of our hydrocarbon reserves are now or will become stranded,” Exxon said, sidestepping shareholders’ demands to know how the company is preparing for carbon asset risk.

Saratoga alleges that members of Exxon’s auditing committee “completely and utterly failed in their duty of oversight and failed in their duty” to review the company’s accounting and other financial practices and disclosures.

Exxon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company is facing mounting legal pressure over its climate change-related disclosures.

The New York attorney general’s office filed a lawsuit against ExxonMobil last year for allegedly defrauding investors for years by deliberately downplaying the climate risks to its business and long-term financial health.  Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey is investigating the company for potentially deceiving shareholders and customers. Healey began her investigation in 2016 after investigative reporting revealed that for decades Exxon knew about and planned internally for climate change for decades but publicly denied those risks.

A recent SEC investigation centered on how the company determined the risk of future greenhouse gas emissions regulations and how it communicated those risks to investors. The SEC also examined Exxon’s policy of not including the value of oil reserves when accounting for that risk. That investigation concluded when the SEC announced last year that it would take no enforcement action. 

Saratoga is asking Exxon to “take all necessary actions to reform and improve its corporate governance and internal procedures to comply with applicable laws and to protect Exxon and its shareholders” from further losses. 

The suit says firm contends the actions and failures of Exxon officials have “irreparably damaged Exxon’s corporate image and goodwill.”.

“For at least the foreseeable future, Exxon will suffer from what is known as the ‘liar’s discount,’ a term applied to the stocks of companies who have been implicated in illegal behavior and have misled the investing public.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Links 8/12/19 – Viral News Connection says:
    August 12, 2019 at 7:13 am

    […] Shareholders Sue Exxon for Misrepresenting Climate Risks Climate Liability News […]

  2. Links 8/12/19 – Breaking Worldwide News says:
    August 12, 2019 at 7:19 am

    […] Shareholders Sue Exxon for Misrepresenting Climate Risks Climate Liability News […]

  3. Links 8/12/19 - News Views says:
    August 12, 2019 at 8:23 am

    […] Shareholders Sue Exxon for Misrepresenting Climate Risks Climate Liability News […]

  4. Links 8/12/19 | AlltopCash.com says:
    August 12, 2019 at 1:39 pm

    […] Shareholders Sue Exxon for Misrepresenting Climate Risks Climate Liability News […]

  5. Two Texas shareholder climate suits vs. Exxon get consolidated says:
    August 15, 2019 at 12:11 pm

    […] is facing a similar lawsuit in New Jersey, where a group of investors filed a lawsuit this week alleging that several of the company’s officials, directors and board members officials “knew, were […]

  6. As Big Oil digs for more despite climate risks, investor lawsuits may grow says:
    September 12, 2019 at 10:37 am

    […] accusing the oil giant of lying to the public about the risks of climate change to its business. Another suit was filed against Exxon last month in federal court in New Jersey by a mutual fund that said the […]

  7. Solutions to Climate Change Cannot Overlook This One Key Factor – Mother Jones – Queens Collaborate says:
    September 29, 2019 at 2:43 pm

    […] in August of this year, shareholders of Exxon Mobil Corp sued the officers and directors of the company claiming, among other things, that they had breached […]

  8. Solutions to Climate Change Cannot Overlook This One Key Factor | SLSV - A global media & CSR consultancy network says:
    October 3, 2019 at 12:53 am

    […] diligence when it comes to climate-related risks?”And in August of this year, shareholders of Exxon Mobil Corp sued the officers and directors of the company claiming, among other things, that they had […]

  9. ExxonMobil Did Not Mislead Shareholders About Climate Risks, Rules New York Court – iftttwall says:
    December 10, 2019 at 3:11 pm

    […] According to CNBC, the case against ExxonMobil was dismissed “with prejudice” which means that it is unlikely Letitia James, the state’s current attorney general, will seek to file another lawsuit against the company. Similar shareholder fraud lawsuits have been filed in Massachusetts, Texas, and New Jersey. […]

  10. ExxonMobil Did Not Mislead Shareholders About Climate Risks, Rules New York Court - G20 Intel says:
    December 10, 2019 at 3:14 pm

    […] According to CNBC, the case against ExxonMobil was dismissed “with prejudice” which means that it is unlikely Letitia James, the state’s current attorney general, will seek to file another lawsuit against the company. Similar shareholder fraud lawsuits have been filed in Massachusetts, Texas, and New Jersey. […]

  11. ExxonMobil Did Not Mislead Shareholders About Climate Risks, Rules New York Court – ALibertarian.org says:
    December 10, 2019 at 3:28 pm

    […] According to CNBC, the case against ExxonMobil was dismissed “with prejudice” which means that it is unlikely Letitia James, the state’s current attorney general, will seek to file another lawsuit against the company. Similar shareholder fraud lawsuits have been filed in Massachusetts, Texas, and New Jersey. […]

  12. Davos (again)! – Reconnecting With Commonsense says:
    January 25, 2020 at 7:45 am

    […] know that many investors understand the risk now, what about Exxon’s own investors who are suing the company because of the potential danger to their money? What about our national […]

  13. Exxon, climate change and the courts: Legal challenges reach critical mass says:
    June 4, 2020 at 3:06 pm

    […] communities have a better chance to succeed. Shareholder lawsuits have also cropped up in Texas and New Jersey accusing the company of misleading investors and a judge has greenlighted another suit over climate […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Climate Case Gets Green Light from European Union Court
  • Exxon Continues to Fund 'Science' Group Steeped in Climate Denial and Delay
  • Pacific Islands Group Pushes for International Court Ruling on Climate and Human Rights
  • Study Estimates Seawalls to Protect U.S. Coast Will Cost $400 Billion
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.