The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Exxon Climate Investigation / New York Judge Rejects Exxon ‘Fishing Expedition’ in Climate Fraud Case
New York Judge Rejects Exxon ‘Fishing Expedition’ in Climate Fraud Case

New York Judge Rejects Exxon ‘Fishing Expedition’ in Climate Fraud Case

August 9, 2019 Filed Under: Exxon Climate Investigation, Featured

print

By Karen Savage

A New York state judge has rejected Exxon’s attempt to force third-party witnesses to produce documents in New York’s climate fraud suit against the oil giant, calling it a “gigantic, burdensome fishing expedition.”

Exxon had demanded third-party witnesses provide the documents prior to submitting to depositions in the case, which the New York attorney general’s office said was effectively pressuring those witnesses not to testify. The AG’s office filed a motion opposing Exxon’s demands, saying it imposed  “disproportionate burdens” on the witnesses and was in violation of an agreement that allowed Exxon to take depositions from key witnesses but mentioned no document requests.

New York Supreme Court Judge Barry Ostrager agreed with the attorney general that Exxon overstepped their agreement by sending letters to witnesses informing them that if they were to testify, they would need to turn over documents in addition to being deposed. Exxon attorneys also reminded witnesses that they cannot be compelled to testify and asked if they would still make themselves available for the trial.

Ostrager ruled on Thursday that while Exxon is entitled to a wide array of documents and it can’t go on a “gigantic, burdensome fishing expedition” to obtain documents that are not related to the case. Ostrager said Exxon must first depose the witnesses in order to establish a “factual predicate” for its request, which includes communication between the witnesses and the attorney general’s office.

“You’re not entitled to burden these third-party witnesses,” Ostrager said during a hearing Thursday, as first reported by Law360.

Exxon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

New York’s lawsuit against Exxon was filed last year, alleging the oil giant deceived investors for years by deliberately downplaying the climate risks to its business and long-term financial health.

The trial is scheduled to begin on Oct. 23, and had Exxon succeeded in forcing witnesses to produce documents, it could have delayed the trial.

“We appreciate the court’s very reasonable decision to deny Exxon’s overburdensome fishing expedition, and look forward to making our case in court this fall,” Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Exxon Climate Investigation, Featured

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Exxon, climate change and the courts: Legal challenges reach critical mass says:
    September 11, 2019 at 11:07 pm

    […] judge presiding over the New York attorney general’s lawsuit recently rejected Exxon’s attempt to compel third party witnesses to provide documents ahead of depositions. The […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases

Most Popular

  • Oil Industry Ally Accuses NY Attorney General of Ethics Violations
  • Climate Activists Win Necessity Defense Case in London
  • New Research Tying 20 Companies to One-Third of Global Emissions Aids Liability Argument
  • Federal Judge Boosts R.I. Climate Lawsuit, Sends It To State Court
  • Connecticut Becomes Latest State to Sue Exxon for Climate Deception

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.