The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / International / Court Advisors Urge Dutch Supreme Court to Uphold Historic Climate Verdict
Court Advisors Urge Dutch Supreme Court to Uphold Historic Climate Verdict

Court Advisors Urge Dutch Supreme Court to Uphold Historic Climate Verdict

September 13, 2019 Filed Under: International

print

By Dana Drugmand

Two independent judicial officials in the Netherlands have advised the Dutch Supreme Court to uphold a groundbreaking ruling in the case Urgenda v. The Netherlands that requires the government to more aggressively cut the country’s emissions. 

The formal opinion, issued Friday, came from the Advocate General and Procurator General, independent positions inside the country’s judiciary system. It backed lower court rulings in the case, initially by the District Court of The Hague in 2015 and reaffirmed by the Court of Appeal last October. That ruling said the Dutch government has a legal duty to strengthen its emissions reduction target for 2020. Per court order, the government must cut emissions by at least 25 percent below 1990 levels – a target that the government is currently not on track to meet. As of 2018, emissions have been reduced only 15 percent below 1990 levels, according to the Netherlands’ national bureau for statistics.

The Advocate General and Procurator General provide formal advisory opinions to the Supreme Court, which can decide whether to follow their advice. The Supreme Court is scheduled to announce its decision in the case on Dec. 20. 

“We are humbled and extremely happy with this positive advice,” Marjan Minnesma, director of the foundation Urgenda Foundation, which brought the lawsuit, said in a statement. “The Government has known since 2015 that it has a legal obligation to significantly reduce Dutch emissions. It has had four years to fulfill that obligation. With this positive advice today, the Government is left with even fewer excuses not to take more action to lower its emissions.”

The victory by Urgenda in the 2015 decision marked the first time a court anywhere in the world has required a country to take more stringent climate action. The Dutch government said it would implement the judgment, but it is so far failing to do so as it has continued to bring appeals. 

According to the opinion of the two judicial advisors, the Court of Appeal was correct in deciding that courts can determine the extent of the government’s legal obligations in the context of human rights. The government argued it has no legal obligation to comply with a stricter emissions reduction target, but the appeals court disagreed and pointed to human rights obligations outlined in treaties like the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 

Urgenda, along with 700 other stakeholders, has outlined 40 measures the government can still take to meet the 25 percent by 2020 target. “If the Government keeps ignoring these calls, it will be in serious danger of flouting the rule of law by disregarding the orders of its own courts,” Minnesma said. 

If the Supreme Court decides in Urgenda’s favor, there would be no further avenue for the government to appeal. 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: International

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Court advisors urge Dutch Supreme Court to uphold historic climate verdict - Climate Liability News | Bible Prophecy In The Daily Headlines says:
    September 14, 2019 at 12:40 am

    […] September 13, 2019 Kimberly Rogers-Brown Supreme Court, WHITE HOUSE Leave a comment Link to original article […]

  2. Irish court rejects demand for more aggressive climate action says:
    September 23, 2019 at 3:56 pm

    […] Court Advisors Urge Dutch Supreme Court to Uphold Historic Climate Verdict […]

  3. Historic Urgenda climate ruling upheld by Dutch Supreme Court says:
    January 30, 2020 at 4:54 pm

    […] Court of The Hague in 2015 and reaffirmed by the Court of Appeal last October. Earlier this year, independent judicial officials advised the Dutch Supreme Court to uphold it. The case was brought by the nonprofit Urgenda […]

  4. Kids facing effects of climate change are taking their governments to court – Menopausal Mother Nature says:
    March 3, 2020 at 1:26 am

    […] the head of the pack is the landmark case Urgenda vs. The Netherlands. In 2015, the district court of The Hague decided the government has a legal duty to strengthen its […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Climate Case Gets Green Light from European Union Court
  • Exxon Continues to Fund 'Science' Group Steeped in Climate Denial and Delay
  • Pacific Islands Group Pushes for International Court Ruling on Climate and Human Rights
  • Study Estimates Seawalls to Protect U.S. Coast Will Cost $400 Billion
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.