The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / International / Heathrow Expansion Violates Rights, Contradicts New UK Climate Goals, Activists Argue
Heathrow Expansion Violates Rights, Contradicts New UK Climate Goals, Activists Argue

Heathrow Expansion Violates Rights, Contradicts New UK Climate Goals, Activists Argue

October 23, 2019 Filed Under: International

print

By Isabella Kaminski

Climate activists in the United Kingdom have doubled down on attempts to stop the expansion of London’s Heathrow airport with fresh arguments that the development would violate the rights of future generations.

During a hearing held in the Court of Appeal in London over the past week, environmental activists Friends of the Earth and Plan B again argued that the government had failed to properly take into account its own commitments and the latest scientific evidence on climate change when deciding whether to build a third runway at Heathrow.

The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) has also joined the case for the first time. It submitted written evidence arguing that the planned expansion violates the rights of children and future generations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). It says this is incompatible with the concept of sustainable development as understood in both domestic and international law.

The High Court of England and Wales dismissed all the original challenges to the expansion in May, ruling that the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change did not apply directly in UK law.

But since then, the UK parliament has voted to formally declare a climate emergency and in June it became the first major economy in the world to sign into law a target for reaching net zero by 2050.

Campaigners argue that expanding Heathrow is clearly incompatible with this legally binding goal. Friends of the Earth told the Court of Appeal that, by refusing to accept the full implications of the Paris Agreement, the Secretary of State responsible for approving the Heathrow project had his “head in the sand.” 

The court’s decision on this matter, they added, would govern the UK’s future approach to sustainable development for major infrastructure projects.

The airport expansion is also opposed by local government councils, the mayor of London and others, who cite a variety of negative impacts, including air pollution and noise.

Technically, the Court of Appeal can only rule on a point of law, in this case whether the Secretary of State’s decision was lawful at the time it was passed. That decision was made before a net zero target had been set. 

But Friends of the Earth contended that one of the government’s own arguments in this latest hearing—that the very adoption of a net zero target made the appeal academic—makes it relevant and open for scrutiny. 

Expansion of the airport is politically very controversial. The UK’s Prime Minister Boris Johnson, whose constituency is near Heathrow, was once so opposed to the project that he promised to “lie down in front of those bulldozers” to stop it. Since taking up the country’s top political job, however, he has been quiet on the subject.

Willie Walsh, chief executive of International Airlines Group, which owns British Airways, recently said the project was “unlikely to go ahead” because it was difficult to justify economically or environmentally.

The court’s decision is expected in the next few months.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: International

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Climate Case Gets Green Light from European Union Court
  • Exxon Continues to Fund 'Science' Group Steeped in Climate Denial and Delay
  • Pacific Islands Group Pushes for International Court Ruling on Climate and Human Rights
  • Study Estimates Seawalls to Protect U.S. Coast Will Cost $400 Billion
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.