The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Exxon Climate Investigation / Exxon Wants Massachusetts Climate Fraud Suit Moved to Federal Court
Exxon Wants Massachusetts Climate Fraud Suit Moved to Federal Court

Exxon Wants Massachusetts Climate Fraud Suit Moved to Federal Court

December 3, 2019 Filed Under: Exxon Climate Investigation, Liability Litigation, Mass. v. Exxon

print

By Karen Savage

Exxon wants Massachusetts’ climate fraud case against it moved to federal court.

In a motion filed Monday in U.S. District Court, Exxon contends the suit, which says the oil giant violated Massachusetts consumer protection laws, instead involves federal statutory, regulatory and constitutional issues. It says the federal court should consider those issues and dismiss the case.

The Massachusetts complaint alleges Exxon repeatedly violated state laws and regulations by deceiving investors on risks posed to the oil giant by climate change and by misleading consumers on the harm done to the climate by the use of its products. It was filed in Suffolk County Superior Court in October. The lawsuit is similar to the one New York filed against Exxon, whose trial concluded last month and is awaiting a verdict in New York Supreme Court. Exxon did not attempt to move that suit to federal court.

“It is not common for that to happen,” said Paul Nolette, a political science professor at Marquette University, adding that most suits filed by AGs are heard in state courts. “Typically these lawsuits that state AGs are bringing either individually or as part of a broader coalition are based squarely on state law, so state consumer law or anti-trust law.”

Exxon, however, is following a pattern of trying to move as many cases as possible to federal court, where it believes it will be more successful in fending off climate-related claims.

“It is clear that although nominally premised on state law and cloaked as consumer protection, this lawsuit at its core seeks to restrict the production, sale, and use of fossil fuels, attempting to usurp policy and foreign affairs roles properly reserved to the federal government,” Thomas C. Frongillo, an Exxon attorney wrote in a notice of removal filed Friday in U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

Exxon also said the state’s suit is “in essence” a class action suit.

The jurisdictional issue has been central to climate liability suits filed against Exxon and other fossil fuel companies by dozens of municipalities across the country, but this the first climate fraud-related case to be bumped to federal court. 

Exxon is alleging the suit is removable under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) which states that certain class action suits belong in federal court, a strategy Nolette said was recently—and unsuccessfully—tested in Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.

In that case, the defendants, an electronics and technology company, sought to have an antitrust lawsuit filed by the Mississippi attorney general removed to federal court, contending the AG was acting as a class action attorney. When the suit was remanded to state court, the defendants appealed to the Supreme Court, which ruled the case belonged in state court and said state AGs don’t fall under CAFA when bringing certain types of cases.

Nolette said Exxon’s argument appears to be somewhat similar.

“They’re making a more specific argument, that ‘We’re not saying the Massachusetts attorney general, anytime that they’re using a consumer claim should be in federal court. What we’re saying is when they try to use state consumer protection law to regulate climate, which is something the federal government should do in its jurisdiction, that’s going beyond the AG’s power and should be in federal court,’” Nolette said. He added that Exxon likely didn’t use that strategy in New York because the New York AG alleged violations of the Martin Act, which is more clearly rooted in state law.

Healey’s office said it intends to file a motion to remand the suit back to state court.

The fossil fuel industry has fought to move climate liability suits to federal courts, where precedent has favored their cases for dismissal, a strategy that worked in getting  cases brought by Oakland/San Francisco and New York City dismissed.

More recently, however, federal courts have returned cases to state courts, where the majority have been filed. Suits filed by Colorado municipalities, Baltimore and the state of Rhode Island  are currently proceeding in state court, while the companies appeal the remand orders in circuit courts. The Ninth Circuit is also considering the same jurisdictional question for several cases brought by California communities. 

Nolette said he believed the Massachusetts case would be returned to state court. 

“Cities have had some success at pushing back against removal and if anything, I think state AGs have an even stronger case to put it back into state court since they have the long history of bringing consumer protection, antitrust and other state law claims and not getting removed to federal court,” he said.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Exxon Climate Investigation, Liability Litigation, Mass. v. Exxon

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Mass. climate fraud suit vs. Exxon belongs in state court, AG argues says:
    December 26, 2019 at 9:58 pm

    […] moved the suit to federal court earlier this month. Fossil fuel defendants—which  are facing an […]

  2. Mass. Amends Complaint, Says Exxon Continues Deception Amid Pandemic - The Climate Docket says:
    June 17, 2020 at 2:57 pm

    […] too busy dealing with New York’s suit to meet deadlines in Massachusetts. Once filed, the company moved the suit, which was filed in state court alleging violations of state court, to federal court. A federal […]

  3. Exxon Uses Anti-SLAPP Law to Claim Mass. Climate Suit Violates Its Rights - The Climate Docket says:
    November 11, 2020 at 10:29 am

    […] has also argued that the case belonged in federal court, but that contention was rejected in […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads
  • Judge Agrees to Divest from Exxon Before New York's Climate Fraud Case
  • Youth Climate Case in Washington State Dismissed by King County Judge
  • Battling for Big Oil: Manufacturing Trade Group Leads Assault on Climate Suits
  • What Oil Companies Knew About Climate Change and When: A Timeline

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.