The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / International / BP Accused of ‘Greenwashing’ and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads
BP Accused of ‘Greenwashing’ and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads

BP Accused of ‘Greenwashing’ and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads

December 4, 2019 Filed Under: International

print

By Dana Drugmand

An environmental law organization has launched a first-of-its-kind complaint against British Petroleum over the company’s latest advertising, claiming it is misleading to consumers. 

ClientEarth submitted its complaint Wednesday to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which governs responsible business conduct for multinational enterprises. This is the first known complaint made under OECD guidelines concerning misleading or deceptive advertising by a fossil fuel company. 

ClientEarth, a United Kingdom-based group, calls BP’s ‘Keep Advancing’ and ‘Possibilities Everywhere’ campaigns classic greenwashing. They are BP’s largest advertising campaigns in a decade, feature renewable energy and give the impression that BP is committed to climate solutions. ClientEarth said BP is trying to change its reputation without changing its core fossil fuel business, which continues to fuel climate change. 

“BP is spending millions on an advertising campaign to give the impression that it’s racing to renewables, that its gas is cleaner, and that it is part of the climate solution,” said ClientEarth lawyer Sophie Marjanac. “This is a smokescreen. While BP’s advertising focuses on clean energy, in reality, more than 96% of the company’s annual capital expenditure is on oil and gas. According to its own figures, BP is spending less than four pounds in every hundred on low-carbon investments each year. The rest is fuelling the climate crisis.”  

According to OECD guidelines, multinational enterprises should “not make representations or omissions, nor engage in any other practices, that are deceptive, misleading, fraudulent or unfair.” ClientEarth argues that BP is omitting and potentially misrepresenting how much it spends on oil and gas compared to renewable energy. ClientEarth is also challenging BP’s statements around the role of gas and the expectation that global energy demand will increase in the coming decades. 

The complaint will be reviewed by the OECD’s point of contact in the UK and will be sent to BP. The process of resolving the complaint could take a year or more. 

“We have not seen this complaint, but we strongly reject the suggestion that our advertising is misleading. BP has clearly said that the world is on an unsustainable path and must do more to reduce emissions. We support a rapid transition of the world’s energy system,” a BP spokesman said in an emailed statement. 

“BP is of course well-known as a major oil and gas producer. We are also committed to advancing a low carbon future. So one of the purposes of this advertising campaign is to let people know about some of the possibilities we see to do that, for example in wind, solar and electric vehicle charging, as well as in natural gas and advanced fuels.” 

BP is not the only oil and gas company to be accused of greenwashing and misleading consumers. ExxonMobil is facing a new lawsuit filed by Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey alleging Exxon violated the state’s consumer protection statute with misleading marketing of its products and other greenwashing actions. Healey’s lawsuit claims that Exxon “targets consumers with deceptive messaging about Exxon as a good environmental steward and of its products as ‘green’ while the company is massively ramping up fossil fuel production and spending only about one-half of 1% of revenues on developing clean energy.” 

With other oil majors like Exxon and Shell also running high-profile marketing campaigns to portray themselves as “green,” ClientEarth is calling on the UK’s next government to take action banning all fossil fuel advertising unless it includes a warning about the impact of fossil fuels on the climate crisis. ClientEarth says fossil fuel companies are following the PR playbook of the tobacco companies. 

“In the past, tobacco companies were able to mislead the public about the safety of their products,” Marjanac said. “We see real parallels with fossil fuel companies and the tobacco industry, which knew about the risks their products posed but used misleading marketing campaigns to sell them regardless.”  

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: International

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. BP Accused of ‘Greenwashing’ and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads – Tech News From The Future says:
    December 5, 2019 at 2:39 pm

    […] Click here to view original web page at http://www.climateliabilitynews.org […]

  2. The Coronavirus Has Created an Opening for Collective Action to Save Our Climate - Citizen Truth says:
    April 22, 2020 at 5:00 pm

    […] that they’ve pretty much lost the battle to deny climate change altogether, they’ve got their greenwashing PR machines on full blast. This includes offering tips on how we as consumers can make responsible choices for […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Toronto Will Explore Suing Big Oil for Climate Costs
  • Dutch Court Upholds Urgenda, Says Government Must Reduce Emissions
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads
  • Judge Agrees to Divest from Exxon Before New York's Climate Fraud Case
  • What Oil Companies Knew About Climate Change and When: A Timeline

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.