The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Mass. v. Exxon / Mass. Amends Complaint, Says Exxon Continues Deception Amid Pandemic
Mass. Amends Complaint, Says Exxon Continues Deception Amid Pandemic

Mass. Amends Complaint, Says Exxon Continues Deception Amid Pandemic

June 6, 2020 Filed Under: Liability Litigation, Mass. v. Exxon

print

By Karen Savage

Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey argues that the Covid-19 crisis has provided a glimpse into the potential effect climate change could have on the fossil fuel industry and accuses ExxonMobil of continuing to deceive its shareholders about future demand for its products. Healey wrote this in her amended complaint filed Friday in her fraud lawsuit against the oil giant.

“The COVID-19 pandemic is giving us a sobering preview of the shocks to financial markets from climate change, and has exposed the massive risk posed to those invested in fossil fuel companies like Exxon by major events that cause global oil demand — and prices — to collapse,” Healey said in a press release. 

The Massachusetts AG’s office filed suit against Exxon in November, alleging the company has known for decades its products drive climate change and has misled consumers and investors. The suit says Exxon used deceptive advertising, failed to disclose climate-related risks to its investors and failed to disclose how catastrophic climate impacts from continued fossil fuel burning could threaten the global economy. 

Healey is the second attorney general to charge Exxon with fraud.  New York Supreme Court Judge Barry Ostrager ruled last year that the New York attorney general failed to prove the company defrauded investors, as alleged in a lawsuit filed in 2018.

Exxon has tried for years to sidestep both AG’s investigations and subsequent lawsuits. It alleged in 2018 that Healey and then-New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman had abused their power by conducting politically-motivated investigations and violating the company’s First Amendment right to free speech. That charge that was eventually dismissed by a federal judge.

Exxon also tried to delay the filing of Healey’s lawsuit last year by arguing that it was too busy dealing with New York’s suit to meet deadlines in Massachusetts. Once filed, the company moved the suit, which was filed in state court alleging violations of state court, to federal court. A federal court judge in March ruled that the case belongs in state court.  

Much has changed since the suit was first filed, according to the amended complaint, which was filed Friday in Suffolk Superior court. 

Extreme weather and the failure to address climate change were ranked as the top two global risks in the next 10 years, according to the World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report for 2020.

J.P. Morgan, the world’s biggest fossil fuel funder, wrote in an internal research note that it could not “rule out catastrophic outcomes where human life as we know it is threatened.”

Global economies ground to a halt this spring, as governments tried to curb the spread of Covid-19. That reduced global oil demand, forcing fossil fuel companies to reduce spending. Exxon announced in April it was reducing capital expenditures by 30 percent this year. 

Exxon posted its first quarterly loss in more than 30 years. Market observers recognized weaknesses in the company’s corporate strategy and other experts predicted that oil investments, much like tobacco stock, will soon be shunned by investors. 

Through all of this, Exxon has downplayed its exposure to sudden shifts in demand and prices, and forecast an increase in demand for its fossil fuel products, the AG’s office alleged in the new filing.

“ExxonMobil has repeated that message even in recent months, as the coronavirus pandemic substantially lowered global fossil fuel demand virtually overnight,” wrote the AG’s office, adding that the company has failed to adequately address and failed to disclose the “catastrophic risks that climate change presents to its business.”

Exxon spokesman Casey Norton said the company looks forward to “refuting the meritless allegations in court.”

“Amending the complaint is another sign the attorney general’s case is baseless,” Norton said.  

Healey said her goal is to hold Exxon accountable for its fraud and to protect Massachusetts from Exxon’s continuing deception.

“Exxon knew about these risks decades ago but kept silent, instead making the calculated decision to mislead Massachusetts investors and consumers, hawking its fossil fuel products as good for the environment, and selling investors snake oil scenarios of ever-growing global demand for fossil fuels,” Healey said.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Liability Litigation, Mass. v. Exxon

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. Exxon Uses Anti-SLAPP Law to Claim Mass. Climate Suit Violates Its Rights - The Climate Docket says:
    November 11, 2020 at 10:29 am

    […] climate impacts from continued fossil fuel burning could threaten the global economy. Healey amended the suit earlier this year, accusing the oil giant of continuing to deceive shareholders about […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Climate Case Gets Green Light from European Union Court
  • Documents Detail What Shell Knew About Climate Change Decades Ago
  • France, Home of the Paris Agreement, Faces Lawsuit for Lack of Climate Progress
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads
  • Court: Climate Impacts of Pipeline Projects Cannot Be Ignored

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.