The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Chevron: California Ruling Should Not Help NYC Revive Its Liability Suit
Chevron: California Ruling Should Not Help NYC Revive Its Liability Suit

Chevron: California Ruling Should Not Help NYC Revive Its Liability Suit

June 18, 2020 Filed Under: California Climate Lawsuits, Liability Litigation, New York City Lawsuit

print

By Karen Savage

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ recent revival of two climate liability suits in California “is irrelevant” to New York City’s quest to keep its similar suit alive, Chevron told the Second Circuit in a letter on Wednesday.

The Second Circuit is considering New York City’s appeal of a federal judge’s decision to throw out its liability suit against  BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, and Royal Dutch Shell. New York argues that the judge misinterpreted its claims when he ruled it was displaced by the Clean Air act. 

The city, which is seeking billions in damages to cover infrastructure improvements needed to protect its residents from the increasing effects of climate change, maintains the suit is not an attempt to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, as the companies claim. The city says it is an attempt to hold the companies liable for climate change-related damage to the city. The suit includes federal claims of public nuisance, private nuisance and trespass and seeks monetary damages to help pay for the costs of protecting the city. 

The companies had relied on a decision by U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup to dismiss cases by San Francisco and Oakland, but that decision was overturned by the Ninth Circuit.  

The Ninth Circuit, however, did not consider the issue of whether federal law applies, which is what New York is pressing. It ruled only that the companies were not acting as federal officers when they produced their product, a determination that would have freed them from liability. 

“While the Ninth Circuit did not reach the question of whether federal common law applies—writing that it was ‘not clear’ that it did—this vacatur provides another reason why the court should not regard [Alsup’s decision] as persuasive here,” wrote John Moore, an attorney for the city, in a letter sent to the court after the appellate court’s decision was released last month.

Chevron contends that the ruling “says nothing about the key question in this appeal—namely, whether federal common law governs tort claims alleging harms related to global climate change.”

The city “fails to explain how the Ninth Circuit’s silence on the relevant issues has any bearing on the persuasiveness for the lower court’s reasoning,” wrote Chevron attorney Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. in the letter.

Oral arguments in the appeal were heard in December and a decision is expected shortly.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: California Climate Lawsuits, Liability Litigation, New York City Lawsuit

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Climate Case Gets Green Light from European Union Court
  • Documents Detail What Shell Knew About Climate Change Decades Ago
  • France, Home of the Paris Agreement, Faces Lawsuit for Lack of Climate Progress
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads
  • Court: Climate Impacts of Pipeline Projects Cannot Be Ignored

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.