The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Latest News / Fossil Fuel Companies Move DC Climate Suit to Federal Court

Fossil Fuel Companies Move DC Climate Suit to Federal Court

July 20, 2020 Filed Under: Latest News, Liability Litigation, Washington DC Lawsuit

print

By Karen Savage

ExxonMobil, BP, Chevron, and Shell want Washington D.C.’s climate deception lawsuit against them moved to federal court.

In a motion filed Friday in U.S. District Court, attorneys for the companies said the suit, filed last month in Washington D.C. Superior Court, should be removed to federal court because it involves federal regulatory, statutory and constitutional climate change issues. 

The removal of the suit to federal court follows a pattern set by fossil fuel companies, which have fought to move the nearly two dozen cases filed against them to federal court, where they believe the cases are more likely to be dismissed. So far, almost all of them have been remanded back to state court as a string of federal judges have decided they involve state laws and not federal issues.

D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine alleges the companies knew as early as the 1950s that emissions from their products posed an existential threat to humanity, but failed to warn consumers and  engaged in a long campaign of deception to cast doubt on climate research in order to protect their profits. That, the lawsuit alleges, violates the district’s consumer protection law. The city is asking the court for an injunction to prevent the companies from engaging in further violations and to compensate the city for damage they have caused. 

The companies maintain the suit is part of a plot by activist lawyers and an attempt to “shape the nation’s energy policy.”

“The federal government has already addressed—and is currently addressing—climate change through domestic statutes and regulations and international agreements.” Exxon attorneys, who spoke on behalf of all the defendants, wrote. 

Under President Trump, the federal government has continually backed out of policies addressing climate change, including by withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement and rolling back nearly 100 environmental and climate change-related regulations.

Exxon and the other oil giants say D.C.’s suit belongs in federal court because it involves potential damage to military installations like the Marine Barracks and the Naval Observatory, as well as federally owned facilities like the Smithsonian Institution, and as well as monuments and parks controlled by the National Park Service. The companies also argue that the “District of Columbia consumers,” should be the plaintiff, not the District of Columbia itself.

Other courts have already rejected several of the fossil fuel companies’ arguments, including the contention that the Federal Officer Removal Statute—which gives federal courts jurisdiction over civil actions directed at the United States or any federal official—applies. That argument has been rebuffed by courts in Massachusetts, Maryland, Colorado and California and those rulings have thus far been upheld on appeal. 

D.C. will have an opportunity to reply and oral arguments will likely be held later this year. 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Latest News, Liability Litigation, Washington DC Lawsuit

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. D.C. Argues Climate Deception Suit Belongs in Local Court - The Climate Docket says:
    August 19, 2020 at 11:39 am

    […] a motion to remand filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court, D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine said the removal of the suit to federal court by the fossil fuel companies was […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases

Most Popular

  • Vulnerable Nations Call for Ecocide to Be Recognized As an International Crime
  • Climate Activists Win Necessity Defense Case in London
  • U.S. Government Knew Climate Risks in 1970s, Energy Advisory Group Documents Show
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Company Will Pay $100 Million for Damaging Louisiana Coast

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.