The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Washington DC Lawsuit / D.C. Argues Climate Deception Suit Belongs in Local Court

D.C. Argues Climate Deception Suit Belongs in Local Court

August 19, 2020 Filed Under: Latest News, Liability Litigation, Washington DC Lawsuit

print

Washington D.C. argued its climate deception lawsuit against ExxonMobil, BP, Chevron, and Shell belongs in local court, not federal court as the companies requested.

In a motion to remand filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court, D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine said the removal of the suit to federal court by the fossil fuel companies was improper.

“The district’s complaint does not raise any federal claims, and the Superior Court is the appropriate forum for adjudicating the exclusively district law claims brought pursuant to the attorney general’s authority under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act,” the AG’s office wrote in the motion. 

In the suit, which was filed in June, Racine alleges the companies knew as early as the 1950s that emissions from their products caused climate change, but instead of warning consumers, they sought to protect their profits. The companies have been shown to have engaged in a decades-long campaign to cast doubt on climate research.

The companies’ alleged deception is a violation of the district’s consumer protection law and does not involve federal claims, the AG’s office contends.

In the motion, the AG’s office also pushed back on a slew of other arguments by the companies, including that the claims arise on federal property, are connected with their operations on the outer continental shelf, and involve actions taken while acting as or under the direction of federal officers.

Fossil fuel companies defendants in climate change-related lawsuits have attempted to use many of those same arguments in suits filed against them by dozens of municipalities across the country. They have tried to have all of them heard in federal court, where they think they have a better chance of success. Thus far, all of those attempts have failed and many of the cases are currently proceeding in state court, where they were initially filed.

Further briefing is expected in the D.C. case and the court will likely hear oral arguments later this year.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Latest News, Liability Litigation, Washington DC Lawsuit Tagged With: Climate, D.C.

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Trackbacks

  1. D.C. Makes Its Argument for Hearing Climate Case in Local Court - The Climate Docket says:
    October 19, 2020 at 2:40 pm

    […] in August filed a motion to return the case to state court, arguing that while the companies’ alleged deception is a violation of district law, it does not […]

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases

Most Popular

  • Vulnerable Nations Call for Ecocide to Be Recognized As an International Crime
  • U.S. Government Knew Climate Risks in 1970s, Energy Advisory Group Documents Show
  • Why a Tidal Wave of Climate Lawsuits Looms Over the Fossil Fuel Industry
  • New Research Tying 20 Companies to One-Third of Global Emissions Aids Liability Argument
  • Carbon Capture: Will It Save the Climate, or the Fossil Fuel Industry?

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.