The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Latest News / DC: Our Climate Liability Case Belongs in State Court, Too

DC: Our Climate Liability Case Belongs in State Court, Too

September 1, 2020 Filed Under: Latest News, Washington DC Lawsuit

print
By Karen Savage

Washington D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine urged the U.S. District Court to follow what other circuit judges have already done around the country and send his climate fraud lawsuit against ExxonMobil, BP, Chevron, and Shell to state court.  

“Four other district courts and three courts of appeal have also rejected defendants’ same arguments for removal jurisdiction in analogous cases where defendants were parties,” Racine said in a brief filed Monday.

Fossil fuel companies being sued in climate change-related lawsuits have attempted to use many of the same arguments across the country. The companies want the cases heard in federal court, where they think they have a better chance of success. 

Thus far, all of those arguments have been rejected and many of the cases are currently proceeding in state court, where they were initially filed.

Washington D.C.’s suit, which was filed in June, alleges the companies knew as early as the 1950s that emissions from their products caused climate change, but instead of warning consumers, they sought to protect their profits. The companies have been shown to have engaged in a decades-long campaign to cast doubt on climate research.

The city is asking the court for an injunction to prevent the companies from continuing the violations and to compensate the city for damage they have caused. 

The companies argue the case involves federal regulatory, statutory and constitutional issues and moved the suit to federal court in July.

The AG’s office contends the companies’ alleged deception is a violation of the district’s consumer protection law and does not involve federal claims. 

Racine also noted that the district’s suit is “indistinguishable” from a case filed by Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, who in a suit filed last year, alleges Exxon similarly deceived investors and consumers in violation of her state’s consumer protection act.

Healeys case was also returned to state court after a district court judge was unpersuaded by Exxon’s argument that it belonged in federal court. 

“There is nothing different about this case, and it too should be remanded to the Superior Court,” Racine wrote, adding that he was asking the court to award the city attorney’s fees and costs incurred.

“An award of fees is warranted since defendants’ removal was objectively unreasonable, as demonstrated by the unanimous opinions of district and appellate courts across the country rejecting subject matter jurisdiction in substantially similar circumstances.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Latest News, Washington DC Lawsuit

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Colorado Judge Rejects Oil Companies’ Attempt to Move Climate Case
  • Biden’s DOJ Could Help Swing Momentum Around Climate Cases
  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?

Most Popular

  • Climate Case Gets Green Light from European Union Court
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads
  • Toronto Will Explore Suing Big Oil for Climate Costs
  • Dutch Court Upholds Urgenda, Says Government Must Reduce Emissions
  • What Oil Companies Knew About Climate Change and When: A Timeline

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.