The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Send All Climate Cases to Federal Court
Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Send All Climate Cases to Federal Court

Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Send All Climate Cases to Federal Court

November 17, 2020 Filed Under: Baltimore Lawsuit, Liability Litigation

print
By Karen Savage

Fossil fuel companies want the Supreme Court to decide the crucial question of jurisdiction over climate lawsuits filed by nearly two dozen municipalities across the country: whether they belong in federal court, where the industry wants them, or in state courts where they were filed.

The Supreme Court has already agreed to review a procedural question in Baltimore’s climate liability suit when it granted a petition from ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies that would impact federal vs. state jurisdiction.  

Now the companies want the high court to expand its review.

“Given the number of climate-change cases pending across the nation, the court should confirm that this case and others like it were properly removed to federal court on the ground that federal common law necessarily governs claims alleging injury based on the contribution of interstate and international emissions to global climate change,” the companies wrote in a brief filed Monday.

Baltimore first filed suit in Maryland state court in 2018, alleging that the fossil fuel companies knew for decades that their products drive climate change but deliberately failed to inform the public about those risks. The city is charging the companies with eight violations, including public nuisance, private nuisance, failure to warn and violations of Maryland’s consumer protection laws. 

As they have in dozens of climate change-related lawsuits filed against them in recent years, the companies moved the case to federal court, where they believe they have a better chance of shaking it, based on federal precedent. Both the U.S. District Court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decided in the city’s favor and ordered the case to state court.

In its ruling, the Fourth Circuit reviewed only the issue of federal officer removal—whether the companies, as they claim, were acting as “federal officers” because they operated with leases issued by the federal government, thus exempting them from state laws. The appeals court declined to consider the energy companies’ other arguments, which it said are not eligible for review. The  companies argue that because those arguments were presented along with the federal officer removal argument—which is eligible for appellate review—they too should have been reviewed.  

 “The court of appeals erred by holding that it lacked jurisdiction to review any of petitioners’ grounds for removal other than the federal-officer ground,” the companies told the court, urging the high court to “address the remaining grounds for removal and reverse the judgment below.”

Alternately, the companies want the court to vacate the appellate court’s ruling and direct it to review all of their arguments.

“Our response in court will be our full comment on the matter,” Dana P. Moore, Baltimore’s acting city solicitor, said in a statement.

An Exxon spokesperson referred to the brief for comments from the company. The other defendants did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

The First, Ninth, and Tenth circuits have upheld similar lower court rulings that the various cases belong in state courts and, like the Fourth Circuit, have determined that the companies’ other arguments are not eligible for review.  

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Baltimore Lawsuit, Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases

Most Popular

  • Shell Claims It Has Not Lobbied Against Climate Action, Despite Ties to Anti-Climate Groups
  • Vulnerable Nations Call for Ecocide to Be Recognized As an International Crime
  • Colombian Court Orders Government to Stop Deforestation, Protect Climate
  • Oil Industry Ally Accuses NY Attorney General of Ethics Violations
  • Federal Judge Boosts R.I. Climate Lawsuit, Sends It To State Court

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.