The Climate Docket

WHAT WE COVER:

  • Liability Litigation
    • Baltimore Lawsuit
    • California Climate Lawsuits
    • Colorado Lawsuit
    • Mass. v. Exxon
    • New York City Lawsuit
    • Rhode Island Lawsuit
    • Other Suits
  • Access to Courts
    • Liability Waivers
    • State Legislation
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Powered by Genesis

You are here: Home / Liability Litigation / Baltimore Lawsuit / Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

January 11, 2021 Filed Under: Baltimore Lawsuit, Latest News, Liability Litigation

print
By Karen Savage

The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court, which has agreed to review a technical ruling by the Fourth Circuit in a climate liability lawsuit filed by Baltimore.

The high court granted the request Friday, after Acting Solicitor General Jeffery B. Wall requested he be allowed to use 10 minutes of the fossil fuel companies’ time, which the energy giants have agreed to cede. 

“The United States and its officers are frequent litigants, and it therefore has a significant interest in the proper application of statutory provisions governing federal appellate jurisdiction,” Wall wrote in a motion filed last month. 

Pat Parenteau, a professor of environmental law at the Vermont Law School, said the granting of Wall’s request by the Supreme Court  isn’t unusual—even considering Wall will likely be out of that post two days later when President-elect Joe Biden is inaugurated and begins the process of installing his own administration.  

“It’s fairly common for the court to invite the views of the solicitor general and allow time at oral argument if the petitioner agrees to take it out of their time,” Parenteau said.

It’s still unclear who Biden will tap for solicitor general, however, his consideration of David C. Frederick—an attorney who represents Shell in several climate change-related cases, including Baltimore’s—has drawn fire from climate activists, the Huffington Post has reported.

“The Shell optics are not good and there are lots of highly qualified and squeaky-clean alternatives,” Parenteau said.

Frederick and his firm, Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, were listed as counsel for Shell in a brief filed Friday by the companies, which reiterated their contention that the Supreme Court should expand its review of Baltimore’s case. The fossil fuel companies want the high court to determine whether dozens of climate cases filed by municipalities across the country belong in state court, where they were filed, or in federal court, where the companies think they will be dismissed based on prior precedent.

“The court should exercise its discretion to consider whether respondent’s claims necessarily arise under federal common law and are thus removable,” the companies wrote in a brief.

“That additional ground for removal is relevant to determining the appropriate disposition after deciding the question presented, and its resolution here is warranted in light of the sheer number of climate-change cases in which that ground for removal is currently being litigated—including several in which petitions for writs of certiorari have recently been filed in this Court.”

Baltimore says the Supreme Court should affirm the Fourth Circuit’s ruling that the case belongs in state court and says the high court should stick to the narrow issue it agreed to review. 

“The court ‘strongly disapprove[s of] the practice of smuggling additional questions into a case after [it] grant[s] certiorari,’” Baltimore told the court, citing prior precedent. 

It “should reject petitioners’ effort to do so” now, the city added. 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Baltimore Lawsuit, Latest News, Liability Litigation

Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
Don't Miss a story
Subscribe 
We promise not to spam you. Unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

Latest News

Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing

By Karen Savage The acting solicitor general will be allowed time to argue in support of ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP and nearly two dozen other companies next week during oral arguments before … [Read More...]

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Questions Oil Companies’ Tactics to Shake Climate Cases
  • Will Amy Coney Barrett, Whose Father Was a Shell Attorney for Decades, Recuse from Climate Suit?
  • Justice Dept. to Argue on Side of Oil Companies in Supreme Court Hearing
  • Oil Companies Ask Supreme Court to Decide Jurisdiction of More Climate Cases

Most Popular

  • Carbon Majors Can Be Held Liable for Human Rights Violations, Philippines Commission Rules
  • Vulnerable Nations Call for Ecocide to Be Recognized As an International Crime
  • BP Accused of 'Greenwashing' and Deceiving Public With Renewable Energy Ads
  • Massive Wildfire Costs Could Sink California's Largest Utility
  • U.S. Should Protect Native Americans from Climate Impacts, Tribes Appeal to UN

Categories

  • Access to Courts
  • Baltimore Lawsuit
  • California Climate Lawsuits
  • Charleston, S.C. Lawsuit
  • Colorado Lawsuit
  • Connecticut Lawsuit
  • Delaware Lawsuit
  • Exxon Climate Investigation
  • Featured
  • Hoboken Lawsuit
  • International
  • Latest News
  • Liability Litigation
  • Liability Waivers
  • Mass. v. Exxon
  • Minnesota Lawsuit
  • New York City Lawsuit
  • Other Suits
  • Politics
  • Rhode Island Lawsuit
  • State Legislation
  • Uncategorized
  • Washington DC Lawsuit

Follow us

  • View climatedocket’s profile on Facebook
  • View climatedocket’s profile on Twitter

RSS

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.